Re: Website broken

On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > Hi there, > > can someone fix this?  This currently hangs the website update. > > mkdir -p out/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/ > msgfmt --output=out/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/newweb.mo po/de.po > po/de.po:166: end-of-line within string > po/de.po:167: en

Website broken

Hi there, can someone fix this? This currently hangs the website update. mkdir -p out/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/ msgfmt --output=out/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/newweb.mo po/de.po po/de.po:166: end-of-line within string po/de.po:167: end-of-line within string -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl - ht

Re: LSR update policies, and WTM is input/new/revised/ ?

Graham Percival wrote: If you're involved with LSR, check out the LSR update docs in the CG on kainhofer in a day or so; please make corrections. Could somebody process the files in input/new/revised/ ? And why do we need this directory, anyway? Shouldn't those files just be dumped into input/

Re: wikipedia...

Op donderdag 04-06-2009 om 11:08 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Francisco Vila: > First thing we can do, given that the talk section is intended to > improve the article, is to write down these objections in it. Well, that's what Han-Wen did in 2006. Nothing happened. I'd say: be bold and fix it

Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up

Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote: Yes, I was testing the GUB binary at lilypond.org. I have just confirmed the problem on 64-bit GNU/Linux too. The problem seems to be exactly what the error message reports: there is no file gs_init.ps located

Re: [PATCH] Fix crash when output-preview-framework is missing

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote: > On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote: >> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:46:11PM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> Am Donnerstag, 28. Mai 2009 22:18:23 schrieb Neil

Re: wikipedia...

2009/6/4 Jan Nieuwenhuizen : > Hi there, > > Triggered by recent wikipedia messages, I had a peek at our > >    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lilypond ... > Possibly it's no wonder that wikipedia doesn't use lilypond, > considering that our article on wikipedia is so bad? First thing we can do, g

Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc

In message <200905312229.35014.reinh...@kainhofer.com>, Reinhold Kainhofer writes Am Sonntag, 31. Mai 2009 21:22:41 schrieb Jan Nieuwenhuizen: Op zaterdag 30-05-2009 om 22:46 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham Percival: > Any more tips? I'd really like to get this working so I can make > re

Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question)

On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 1:08 AM, Mark Polesky wrote: > Patrick McCarty wrote: >> I don't know if there is any performance penalty, but it's probably >> negligible.  You could propose that these procedures be made public; I >> am okay with it. > > Then if no one has any reservations, does anyone wa

Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up

Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote: Yes, I was testing the GUB binary at lilypond.org. I have just confirmed the problem on 64-bit GNU/Linux too. The problem seems to be exactly what the error message reports: there is no file gs_init.ps located

LSR update policies, and WTM is input/new/revised/ ?

If you're involved with LSR, check out the LSR update docs in the CG on kainhofer in a day or so; please make corrections. Could somebody process the files in input/new/revised/ ? And why do we need this directory, anyway? Shouldn't those files just be dumped into input/new/ ? Cheers, - Graham

Re: wikipedia...

2009/6/4 Jan Nieuwenhuizen : > Op donderdag 04-06-2009 om 11:08 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Francisco > Vila: > >> First thing we can do, given that the talk section is intended to >> improve the article, is to write down these objections in it. > > Well, that's what Han-Wen did in 2006.  Nothing

Naming output files - status update please?

Hi all, I've been prompted by a reply from Mats on the -user list. >See >http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2009-02/msg00833.html >and follow-ups for the previous discussion on the topic. As far as I >can see, an implementation proposal is already available, just to >commit. >

wikipedia...

Hi there, Triggered by recent wikipedia messages, I had a peek at our http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lilypond page and found it still has the weird (long and not very impressive) fire breathers example. Why the .ly at all, better show impressive output and move .ly example to a LilyPond_Lang