Re: beat grouping vs. beam grouping

2009-06-01 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> A git grep for beam-grouping returned only the snippet you referenced above. > > A git grep for "beam grouping" returned only one reference which was in the > snippet you referenced above. > > Can you be more specific about where the doc references to > beam-grouping are? Sorry, for being imp

Re: Better MIDI

2009-06-01 Thread Peter Chubb
> "Carl" == Carl D Sorensen writes: Carl> On 6/1/09 5:29 PM, "Peter Chubb" Carl> wrote: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> I've put up a page on how to get more realistic sounding MIDI >> output from current LilyPond, along with the scripts and scheme >> code used, at http://www.nicta.com.au/people/chub

Re: Better MIDI

2009-06-01 Thread Carl D. Sorensen
On 6/1/09 5:29 PM, "Peter Chubb" wrote: > > > Hi, > > I've put up a page on how to get more realistic sounding MIDI output > from current LilyPond, along with the scripts and scheme code used, at > http://www.nicta.com.au/people/chubbp/articulate Peter, I haven't had a chance to loo

Better MIDI

2009-06-01 Thread Peter Chubb
Hi, I've put up a page on how to get more realistic sounding MIDI output from current LilyPond, along with the scripts and scheme code used, at http://www.nicta.com.au/people/chubbp/articulate It has before-and-after MIDI samples to listen to, and a full description of what the script

Re: beat grouping vs. beam grouping

2009-06-01 Thread Carl D. Sorensen
On 6/1/09 5:16 AM, "Werner LEMBERG" wrote: > > > In the docs there are references to both `beam-grouping' and > `beat-grouping'. This is confusing. However, `beam-grouping' doesn't > exist in the source code. I thus suggest to replace `beam-grouping' > with `auto-beam beat-grouping' just

setting `to-barline' for trills too?

2009-06-01 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Currently, `to-barline' is set to ##f for trills. What about changing it so that ##t is the default? Werner ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

beat grouping vs. beam grouping

2009-06-01 Thread Werner LEMBERG
In the docs there are references to both `beam-grouping' and `beat-grouping'. This is confusing. However, `beam-grouping' doesn't exist in the source code. I thus suggest to replace `beam-grouping' with `auto-beam beat-grouping' just to avoid the term `beam-grouping' altogether. The snippet `b

bad formatting of lilypond grammar

2009-06-01 Thread Werner LEMBERG
The lilypond grammar contains some extremely long lines which look very bad in formatting (and are difficult to comprehend), for example 206 music_function_chord_body: music_function_identifier_musicless_prefix EXPECT_MUSIC function_arglist_nonmusic

Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc

2009-06-01 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 09:20:24PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > diff --git a/gub/specs/darwin/odcctools.py b/gub/specs/darwin/odcctools.py > index ee953c0..1d24944 100644 I'm getting very confused trying to figure out what file affects the darwin-x86::cross/gcc compilations. Candidates are:

Re: [Issue?] hiding Accidental(s) on tied note(s) after a line break

2009-06-01 Thread David Kastrup
Joe Neeman writes: [...] >> p.s. Despite [As a result of?] banging my head against this >> particular wall, I think I learned a little about Scheme + >> Lilypond... that's some consolation! =) > > If it's any additional consolation, your approach would have been > perfectly ok were it not for t

Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc

2009-06-01 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 09:20:24PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > diff --git a/gub/specs/darwin/odcctools.py b/gub/specs/darwin/odcctools.py > index ee953c0..1d24944 100644 > --- a/gub/specs/darwin/odcctools.py > +++ b/gub/specs/darwin/odcctools.py > @@ -62,3 +62,8 @@ cd %(install_prefix)s%(cros