Hi Jan,
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:18:25AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Op woensdag 22-04-2009 om 21:07 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Patrick
> McCarty:
>
> > Your latest fixes on master work for me.
> >
> > I can now build all of the installers except for darwin-*. Attached
> > is the log
On 4/26/09 5:02 PM, "John Mandereau" wrote:
> Hi Carl,
> Carl D. Sorensen a écrit :
>> I've attached a patch that puts the grammar in the Notation Reference as an
>> appendix, given that lilygrammar.txt is found in Documentation/user.
>>
> I called it ly-grammar.txt.
>
>> I can't commit the
Jan Nieuwenhuizen a écrit :
Thanks, please ping me when this is in lilypond master?
It is :-)
Cheers,
John
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hi Carl,
Carl D. Sorensen a écrit :
I've attached a patch that puts the grammar in the Notation Reference as an
appendix, given that lilygrammar.txt is found in Documentation/user.
I called it ly-grammar.txt.
I can't commit these changes myself, because they'll break compiling if the
makefi
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:35:33AM -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
>> I'm beginning to suspect that we should just explain this better in
>> the tutorial
>
> Didn't you just recently say that this should NOT be in LM?
Sorry, I mis-spoke. We should explain that details of \header
stuff is in the
I'm beginning to suspect that we should just explain this better in
the tutorial
Didn't you just recently say that this should NOT be in LM?
... after all, the command is \header.
That is, one must admit, a confusing command... none of the items are
actually put in a "header" (as most peo
Headings (Titles) and Margin Text (Headers and Footers)
If I read `margin' I only think of left and right margins.
So Lilypond's "top-margin" and "bottom-margin" properties make no
sense? ;)
It's clear in the typographic world (including HTML/CSS, etc.) that
the margin extends around the e
2009/4/26 Trevor Daniels :
> Just to recap, the advantage of \override over \set is that previously
> overridden values can be recovered by \revert because they are
> pushed onto a stack, whereas \unset simply restores the original
> default value. Is that right?
Yes.
The problem with context p
>> Then I suggest
>> Titles, Headings, Headers, Footers
>> or something similar to avoid the nasty `/'.
>
> Headings (Titles) and Margin Text (Headers and Footers)
If I read `margin' I only think of left and right margins.
Werner
___
lilypond
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 04:58:12PM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> > Since "Heading" and "Header" are extremely similar, explicitly
> > including the word "title" decreases the likelihood of
> > miscommunication and misunderstanding, which is what we're trying to
> > solve here.
> >
> > Kieren.
Then I suggest
Titles, Headings, Headers, Footers
or something similar to avoid the nasty `/'.
Headings (Titles) and Margin Text (Headers and Footers)
??
Kieren.
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/l
> Since "Heading" and "Header" are extremely similar, explicitly
> including the word "title" decreases the likelihood of
> miscommunication and misunderstanding, which is what we're trying to
> solve here.
>
> Kieren.
Then I suggest
Titles, Headings, Headers, Footers
or something similar to
Titles, Headings, and Headers/Footers
I don't see an immediate difference between titles and headings.
The latter includes the former AFAIK.
Since "Heading" and "Header" are extremely similar, explicitly
including the word "title" decreases the likelihood of
miscommunication and misund
Neil Puttock wrote Saturday, April 25, 2009 4:27 PM
2009/4/25 Carl D. Sorensen :
On 4/25/09 8:24 AM, "Neil Puttock" wrote:
2009/4/22 Carl D. Sorensen :
Does this help clarify what I'm thinking?
Yes, thank you.
To be honest, I'm not convinced by the idea of using a fake grob
just
fo
> Or even
>
> Titles, Headings, and Headers/Footers
I don't see an immediate difference between titles and headings. The
latter includes the former AFAIK.
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/ma
Hi all,
Any suggestions for the name?
Perhaps
Headings, headers, and footers
Or even
Titles, Headings, and Headers/Footers
?
Kieren.
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-dev
Patrick McCarty wrote Re: recent beaming change?
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Andrew Hawryluk
wrote:
My latest LilyPond build (2.13.1, 24 Apr 2009) produces
different
beaming than my last build.
e.g. {c''8 c'' c'' c''}
used to produce |_|_|_|
and now it gives me |_| |_|
Was this inten
> I'm a lot more willing to rename this section. I've seen
> somewhere between 3-10 people confused by this in the past 5
> years. "Titular material"? "Headers and footers"? Any
> suggestions for the name?
Perhaps
Headings, headers, and footers
Werner
__
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 08:06:30AM -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> Hi Chip,
>
>> As a nooby if I'm looking for info on adding a date to the footer I
>> start by
>> searching for Footer in the index of the LM, but it's not there.
>
> That should be the first thing to get fixed! =)
> Graham/Carl:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 07:02:23AM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Chip wrote:
>> But first I want to suggest this: move the section '3.2
>> Titles and
>> headers' found in the NOTATION Reference to the LM. Why? Because the NR
>> should
>> be about Notation, and headers/footers/titles are not nota
Hi Chip,
first I want to suggest this: move the section '3.2 Titles and
headers'
found in the NOTATION Reference to the LM. Why? Because the NR should
be about Notation, and headers/footers/titles are not notation.
Interesting... I'm curious to see what others' opinions are.
Although it does
Chip wrote:
There has been recent discussion on -user regarding getting the date in the
footer. One of the problems in finding the solution has been the docs
themselves. I have a suggestion that may, in the long run, help
straighten a few
things out. But first I want to suggest this: move the se
There has been recent discussion on -user regarding getting the date in the
footer. One of the problems in finding the solution has been the docs
themselves. I have a suggestion that may, in the long run, help
straighten a few
things out. But first I want to suggest this: move the section '3.2
T
23 matches
Mail list logo
