I had NR 2.2 and 2.6. NR 2.2 is done and 2.6 has one TBC about
fingerings, which I still intend to address.
Andrew
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> If we get anybody volunteering to do doc work as part of GOP, I'll
> need to know what's happening. What are people current
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> Graham Percival wrote Saturday, January 03, 2009 2:40 AM
>
> How much oversight should the Frog patches receive? These patches
>> have been reviewed by Carl. They compile cleanly, adhere to our
>> code standards (to the extent that Carl
In message <1231028567.28463.82.ca...@freemousse>, John Mandereau
writes
I keep all my svn/git checkouts on /sd, of course. I suppose
there's plenty of disk space to compile stuff on it, but...
630 Mhz.
This is the frequency in idle state, it should increase to 900 MHz every
time the CPU beco
Le vendredi 02 janvier 2009 à 18:52 -0800, Graham Percival a écrit :
> I'll have the pdf on my
> website for GOP, and after the first few weeks, this document
> shouldn't be changing much, so the normal stable release will be
> fine.
IMHO a few weeks won't be enough for stabilizing the Guide, but
Le samedi 03 janvier 2009 à 20:54 +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen a écrit :
> I was hoping someone would see the beauty of scons and
> junk our stepmake cruft ;-)
I'm afraid it is too late to resurrect SCons, or too early if you
prefer. I remember a number of packages used a so-called revolutionary
prog
If we get anybody volunteering to do doc work as part of GOP, I'll
need to know what's happening. What are people currently working
on?
Trevor: LM Master, polishing it to perfection.
Carl: NR 6.
Is anybody else working on anything?
(I'm going to re-advertize GOP in 2 or 3 weeks, once I've sett
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 08:54:12PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Op vrijdag 02-01-2009 om 22:53 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef John
> Mandereau:
>
> Hi John,
>
> > and it
> > calls scripts in stepmake/bin or buildscripts that have been removed
> > several years ago.
>
> Ouch. And here I was
Op vrijdag 02-01-2009 om 22:53 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef John
Mandereau:
Hi John,
> Have you any plan for maintaining Scons support in LilyPond?
> The Python
> code hasn't been updated to be compatible with Python 2.6/3.0,
No.
> and it
> calls scripts in stepmake/bin or buildscripts that h
Op donderdag 01-01-2009 om 17:54 uur [tijdzone -0200], schreef Han-Wen
Nienhuys:
> I'm toying with gub3 (on Fedora 10), but the compile halts at glibc-core,
>
> CPP='i686-linux-gcc -E -x c-header'
> /home/lilydev/vc/gub3/target/linux-x86/build/glibc-core-2.3/elf/ld-linux
> .so.2 --library-path
>
Op donderdag 01-01-2009 om 13:46 uur [tijdzone -0800], schreef Graham
Percival:
> Yes, but I see that there's still some LD_LIBRARY_PATH in
> gub/tools.py from the online git version -- lines 31 and 69.
I see, you also removed the one at line 31 before. I was
thinking Rainold was OK with leaving
On 1/3/09 4:16 AM, "Trevor Daniels" wrote:
>
>
> Carl D. Sorensen wrote Friday, January 02, 2009 7:56 PM
>
>> I'd be in favor of a policy that says the equivalent of the following:
>>
>> "Each chapter has a defined section structure.
>>
>> The structure consists of chapter, section, and s
Carl D. Sorensen wrote Friday, January 02, 2009 7:56 PM
I'd be in favor of a policy that says the equivalent of the following:
"Each chapter has a defined section structure.
The structure consists of chapter, section, and subsection.
If subsubsections are desired, they should be unnumbered,
Graham Percival wrote Saturday, January 03, 2009 2:40 AM
How much oversight should the Frog patches receive? These patches
have been reviewed by Carl. They compile cleanly, adhere to our
code standards (to the extent that Carl understands them), and
appear to fix the bug.
I see three proposa
Graham Percival Saturday, January 03, 2009 4:01 AM
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 12:56:18PM -0700, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
On 1/2/09 12:30 PM, "Trevor Daniels" wrote:
> I agree; that's why it is important to set out the standards
> clearly and to ensure they are consistent with clarity. Look
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
