> 1) Ignore this issue for now, and revisit it in 3 weeks when I get
> around to working on that part of the website.
OK. Please do a ping if you are ready for that.
> 2) Somebody (Werner?) takes reponsibility for the "coding style"
> instructions, and either commits the texinfo to the web-gop/
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 07:24:28PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> Was this what Han-Wen fixed when he tagged 2.12.0? These three
> commits were never merged, so maybe that's why your builds were
> failing.
>
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/release/2.12
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 4:21 PM, John Mandereau
wrote:
> Le dimanche 28 décembre 2008 à 15:54 -0800, Graham Percival a écrit :
>> Reinhold posted this a few days ago, but I'm trying to restart the
>> discussion. Attempting to build the 2.12.1 release fails when
>> creating the zip file of the mus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 29. Dezember 2008 01:32:17 schrieb Bertalan Fodor:
> Reinhold Kainhofer írta:
> > Am Montag, 29. Dezember 2008 01:01:14 schrieb Bertalan Fodor:
> >> The subsubsubsections are not present in LM toc.
> >
> > Which subsubsubsections are you tal
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 01:31:34AM +0100, John Mandereau wrote:
> Le dimanche 28 d??cembre 2008 ?? 16:23 -0800, Graham Percival a ??crit :
> > You're off the hook until GUB is added to git. :)
> > (no, don't use the current gub/ branch in git; it's out of date.
> > And yes, this is counter-intuiti
Yes, I'm talking about these headlines as in the NR they are included in
the toc.
Reinhold Kainhofer írta:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 29. Dezember 2008 01:01:14 schrieb Bertalan Fodor:
The subsubsubsections are not present in LM toc.
Which subsubsubsect
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 01:25:37AM +0100, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am Montag, 29. Dezember 2008 01:01:14 schrieb Bertalan Fodor:
> > The subsubsubsections are not present in LM toc.
>
> Which subsubsubsections are you talking about exactly?
Le dimanche 28 décembre 2008 à 16:23 -0800, Graham Percival a écrit :
> You're off the hook until GUB is added to git. :)
> (no, don't use the current gub/ branch in git; it's out of date.
> And yes, this is counter-intuitive, but don't talk about that for
> another week or two)
Aren't GUB source
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 01:01:14AM +0100, Bertalan Fodor wrote:
> The subsubsubsections are not present in LM toc. Is this intentional?
This might be a "version of texi2html" thing; I can't find the ToC
for the LM at all on lilypond.org. On kainhofer it looks fine:
http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 29. Dezember 2008 01:01:14 schrieb Bertalan Fodor:
> The subsubsubsections are not present in LM toc.
Which subsubsubsections are you talking about exactly?
I'm only seeing subsubsections (e.g. "2.1.1 Compiling a file") and some
headlines
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 01:03:04AM +0100, John Mandereau wrote:
> Le dimanche 28 d??cembre 2008 ?? 15:35 -0800, Graham Percival a ??crit :
> > Remember that "python --version" calls the first version in the
> > PATH. /usr/bin/python (which is what we use instead of the more
> > sensible /usr/bin/e
Le dimanche 28 décembre 2008 à 15:54 -0800, Graham Percival a écrit :
> Reinhold posted this a few days ago, but I'm trying to restart the
> discussion. Attempting to build the 2.12.1 release fails when
> creating the zip file of the musicxml regression tests.
> Reinhold suggested that the proble
2008/12/28 Arvid Grøtting :
> Apart from convert-ly setting a 2.11.66 version header, is there
> anything i really shouldn't be happy with?
The binary is OK, but the webpage was not allright on time, and some
developers think that a few things still needed to be done. One or two
broken links in do
Le dimanche 28 décembre 2008 à 15:35 -0800, Graham Percival a écrit :
> Remember that "python --version" calls the first version in the
> PATH. /usr/bin/python (which is what we use instead of the more
> sensible /usr/bin/env python) might be different.
I'm sure it's easy to set
TARGET_PYTHON=/u
The subsubsubsections are not present in LM toc. Is this intentional?
Thanks,
Bert
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
2008/12/29 Graham Percival :
> Remind me again in a month and we'll track down what's happening
> and get it into git.
That would be great. Sorry for my short understanding of the big
frame, but I cannot find a reason why are there any source files that
are not in git.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz
Reinhold posted this a few days ago, but I'm trying to restart the
discussion. Attempting to build the 2.12.1 release fails when
creating the zip file of the musicxml regression tests.
I don't know whether to bug Reinhold for doing musicxml, John for
being one of the few people who somewhat under
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 01:39:54AM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2008/12/28 Graham Percival :
> > Compared to current master, what are the remaining last-minute
> > changes that people want, and when do you think you'll have them
> > committed?
>
> I do not know if the new Spanish resource file f
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 12:28:47AM +0100, John Mandereau wrote:
> What does "python --version" says?
Remember that "python --version" calls the first version in the
PATH. /usr/bin/python (which is what we use instead of the more
sensible /usr/bin/env python) might be different.
> IIRC Leopard c
The current page is this:
http://lilypond.org/web/devel/participating/standards
but of course it's hard to find. The whole "development" subtree
of the website is an absolute mess, and was one of the major
irritations that led to GWP (and GOP). After GOP, this info will
also be available in pdf
And: Python 2.5 is in this (it was part of LilyPad).
I'll try changing that John to see if I can get the bundle to work.
Josh
On Dec 28, 2008, at 3:28 PM, John Mandereau wrote:
Le dimanche 28 décembre 2008 à 17:02 -0600, Neil Tiffin a écrit :
This version referenced here, seemed to mostly wo
Hi Neil... are you on PPC? Or intel?
Best,
Josh
On Dec 28, 2008, at 3:02 PM, Neil Tiffin wrote:
This version referenced here, seemed to mostly work. Except as
follows when trying to convert the initial template from 2.8 to
current (2.12.0).
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Ma
Le dimanche 28 décembre 2008 à 17:02 -0600, Neil Tiffin a écrit :
> This version referenced here, seemed to mostly work. Except as
> follows when trying to convert the initial template from 2.8 to
> current (2.12.0).
> ImportError: No module named shutil
>
> Is there anything I can do to hel
And to be superfluous, the coding style should usually be dictated by
the current style, but where we are not consistent, or where we're
changing conventions, it may make sense to document things.
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 9:24 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> We have a page on the website somewhere,
We have a page on the website somewhere, that deals with this.
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 9:13 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
>> while I do not oppose to either change, I think it is important to
>> record the preference for either somewhere,
>
> Where? Will document it then.
>
>
>Werner
>
--
This version referenced here, seemed to mostly work. Except as
follows when trying to convert the initial template from 2.8 to
current (2.12.0).
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Maui-Scr/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin/convert-ly",
line 40, in
import lilylib as ly
F
> Can you file a full bugreport?
Done, issue #716.
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Le samedi 27 décembre 2008 à 15:04 -0800, Graham Percival a écrit :
> I'm planning a 2.12.1 release soon; we're unofficially thinking of
> this as the "real" 2.12 stable release.
>
> Compared to current master, what are the remaining last-minute
> changes that people want, and when do you think yo
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>>> Can you file a full bugreport?
>>
>> Before I do this: How can I provide more useful debugging information?
>
> The sequence of commands to reproduce. If this started recently, when
> this problem was introduced.
I see this too, but i
Le dimanche 28 décembre 2008 à 12:23 -0800, Graham Percival a écrit :
> I've already got your list. I'm going to advertize it once 2.12.1
> is uploaded.
I'll submit a news article on linuxfr.org.
Cheers,
John
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 06:15:47PM -0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 9:04 PM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
> > I'm planning a 2.12.1 release soon; we're unofficially thinking of
> > this as the "real" 2.12 stable release.
>
> As an aside, I have had the habit of posting the ann
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 9:04 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> I'm planning a 2.12.1 release soon; we're unofficially thinking of
> this as the "real" 2.12 stable release.
>
> Compared to current master, what are the remaining last-minute
> changes that people want, and when do you think you'll have th
On 28.12.2008 (13:05), Trevor Daniels wrote:
> At present the MensuralVoice context sets the NoteHead style to 'petrucci,
> but does not set the style for rests. I know nothing of ancient music,
> but it seems to me that rests should be set to 'mensural style? Advice
> please, from anyone who
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>> > programming error: Parsed object should be dead:
>> >static scm_unused_struct* Prob::mark_smob(scm_unused_struct*)
>> > continuing, cross fingers
>> > programming error: Parsed object should be dead:
>> >static scm_unused_stru
> > If compiled with --disable-optimisation, calling lilypond always emits
> >
> > programming error: Parsed object should be dead:
> >static scm_unused_struct* Prob::mark_smob(scm_unused_struct*)
> > continuing, cross fingers
> > programming error: Parsed object should be dead:
> >stat
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 7:22 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> If compiled with --disable-optimisation, calling lilypond always emits
>
> programming error: Parsed object should be dead:
>static scm_unused_struct* Prob::mark_smob(scm_unused_struct*)
> continuing, cross fingers
> programming err
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer
wrote:
> Actually, those definitions are not only meant for musicxml2ly. They do not
> depend on anything MusicXML-specific, but rather implement features that are
> available in MusicXML, but not yet in LilyPond. They are candidates for future
I took the last version of LilyPad that was sent around the list, and
merged it with the intel 2.12... Here is what I get that works on intel:
www.dxarts.washington.edu/~joshp/LilyPond.app.zip
Other things (version numbers, etc.) don't appear correct, but this
does run fine (first run is slo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Donnerstag, 18. Dezember 2008 19:37:19 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer
> wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 18. Dezember 2008 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys:
> >> Can you put your timesig code into a .scm (or .ly) f
Indeed, it's running here!
thank you!
Ivo Bouwmans escreveu:
Hallo all,
Josh Parmenter schreef / wrote / skribis:
I just noticed that the 2.12 download for Mac Leopard still has
directions for building, etc. I thought the wrapper app problems had
been solved? Is this not the case?
The link
Hallo all,
Josh Parmenter schreef / wrote / skribis:
I just noticed that the 2.12 download for Mac Leopard still has
directions for building, etc. I thought the wrapper app problems had
been solved? Is this not the case?
The link for Leopard on the LilyPond download page points to a page
(iv
At present the MensuralVoice context sets the NoteHead style to 'petrucci,
but does not set the style for rests. I know nothing of ancient music, but
it seems to me that rests should be set to 'mensural style? Advice please,
from anyone who understands ancient music.
Trevor
I agree and would like to support this too...
josé
Josh Parmenter escreveu:
So why not make the 10.5 package use it? Or is there a way to make it
available? It seems like it would make more sense to point users to
the 10.5 only wrapper then to continue directing them to build / hack
it themsel
Graham Percival writes:
> [...] 2.12.1 (the first 2.12 release that
> people might be happy with :) [...]
FWIW, I'm using 2.12.0 now, and I'm happy with it so far.
(I published a 4-page male choir piece by F. A. Reissiger (1809-1883)
yesterday, engraved by Lilypond 2.12.0. Looks good to me. P
one way to make point and click work on windows xp follows [...]
Wonderful, it works for me.
Great job.
Thanks you.
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
2008/12/28 Graham Percival :
> BTW, buildscripts: wait until 2.12.1 (the first 2.12 release that
> people might be happy with :) is out.
LOL, you're starting to sound like a KDE4 dev :-)
Cheers,
Valentin
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-deve
46 matches
Mail list logo
