> > > > 1) use ImageMagick/convert to scale images at build time;
> > >
> > > Seriously? I was expecting that we could do {scale=50%} or
> > > something like that... oh well.
> >
> > Maybe texi2html already supports this; if not, let's send a
> > feature request.
>
> To be fair, texinfo itself do
So why not make the 10.5 package use it? Or is there a way to make it
available? It seems like it would make more sense to point users to
the 10.5 only wrapper then to continue directing them to build / hack
it themselves... no?
http://lilypond.org/web/install/
If there is a way I could he
Thanks, John!
-Patrick
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 5:21 PM, John Mandereau
wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
> Le samedi 27 décembre 2008 à 15:32 -0800, Patrick McCarty a écrit :
>> I noticed an interesting thread a few days ago on the Guile mailing
>> list related to LilyPond. Here is the thread:
>>
>> http://
Hi Josh,
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Josh Parmenter wrote:
> I just noticed that the 2.12 download for Mac Leopard still has directions
> for building, etc. I thought the wrapper app problems had been solved? Is
> this not the case?
I think the problem is that the wrapper app *only* works o
I just noticed that the 2.12 download for Mac Leopard still has
directions for building, etc. I thought the wrapper app problems had
been solved? Is this not the case?
Best,
Josh
**
/* Joshua D. Parmenter
http://www.realizedsound.net/josh/
“Every com
In
http://lilypond.org/web/install/index.html
there is a problem in the column LilyPond Version for 2.12: unexpanded
macro, perhaps?
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
http://www.paconet.org
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http:
Hi Patrick,
Le samedi 27 décembre 2008 à 15:32 -0800, Patrick McCarty a écrit :
> I noticed an interesting thread a few days ago on the Guile mailing
> list related to LilyPond. Here is the thread:
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2008-12/msg00039.html
>
> The suggested fix is t
Le samedi 27 décembre 2008 à 16:54 -0800, Graham Percival a écrit :
> Could you add a "make test" or "make simple" or something
> like that in the texinfo/ dir? This would create a version of the
> texinfo portion of the website which is created with texi2html
> *only*. No imagemagick, no awk, id
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 04:05:48PM +0100, John Mandereau wrote:
> Le vendredi 26 d??cembre 2008 ?? 17:11 -0800, Graham Percival a ??crit :
> > That said, my initial thought is that you're right. The directory
> > structure should match the website; that should make it easier to
> > figure out what
Le samedi 27 décembre 2008 à 17:32 +0100, Reinhold Kainhofer a écrit :
> I haven't tested all of them, but so far all PDF plugins I have seen really
> suck (they produce very raw pdf, basically pure html without any styling
> converted to pdf).
Oh, so let's stick to our good old HTML, Python and
2008/12/28 Graham Percival :
> I'm planning a 2.12.1 release soon; we're unofficially thinking of
> this as the "real" 2.12 stable release.
>
> Compared to current master, what are the remaining last-minute
> changes that people want, and when do you think you'll have them
> committed?
I do not kn
Henning Plumeyer wrote:
>
> Hope, this is the right place to post this:
>
so do i!
textedit does not work correctly in windows xp
it does not use the editor one is used to work with
one way to make point and click work on windows xp follows - of course a
solution within Lilypond would be pre
Hello,
I noticed an interesting thread a few days ago on the Guile mailing
list related to LilyPond. Here is the thread:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2008-12/msg00039.html
The suggested fix is trivial, and I've tested the latest git with
Guile 1.8.6 and 1.8.4 on GNU/Linux x86.
Le samedi 27 décembre 2008 à 14:58 -0800, Graham Percival a écrit :
> Translators: please send your translated versions of the release
> notes to John so that we can add them to the website. And/or
> commit directly to the web branch in git.
Our messages almost crossed each other ;-)
> I found
I'm planning a 2.12.1 release soon; we're unofficially thinking of
this as the "real" 2.12 stable release.
Compared to current master, what are the remaining last-minute
changes that people want, and when do you think you'll have them
committed?
Cheers,
- Graham
Translators: please send your translated versions of the release
notes to John so that we can add them to the website. And/or
commit directly to the web branch in git.
I found a bunch of translations on the wiki, but I'm not certain
which ones are up-to-date.
Typo for John to fix (in English):
> And to be honest, it's not like the pdfs that texinfo produces are
> fantastic examples of typesetting, either.
I'll improve this, by reporting layout bugs to the texinfo people, for
example. It will be better soon, I think, especially the vertical
spacing.
Werner
__
Doing it automatically would be a bit problematic, but there's
nothing wrong with listing the new snippets (from the "unapproved"
list). That said, I'd suggest doing this as part of the Report
rather than emails to -user.
It might also be better to have an "interesting snippets of the
week", rath
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 3:18 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>> 4) Abandon the "complete website as pdf" idea and just give
>> people a tarball of the website for off-online browsing.
>>
> ...
>> So far I'm leaning towards #4; interested readers can still print
>> the HTML directly, although the paginat
I can't think of anything you've missed, but if we get another pair of
hands running the LSR, would it be useful/reasonable to have a weekly
or monthly email to -user listing the new snippets?
OR
Could LSR have a "browse by date added" feature added?
Andrew
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Grah
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Samstag, 27. Dezember 2008 14:28:45 schrieb Valentin Villenave:
> 2008/12/26 John Mandereau :
> > The HTML used in current website is quite simple, it even doesn't have
> > and elements, it won't be hard to generate it from
> > texi2html. LilyPon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Samstag, 27. Dezember 2008 16:31:13 schrieb John Mandereau:
> Le vendredi 26 décembre 2008 à 11:16 -0800, Patrick McCarty a écrit :
> > > If I may add my 2 geeky cents, if we used a PHP-based content
> > > management system, we could easily offer a
Le vendredi 26 décembre 2008 à 11:16 -0800, Patrick McCarty a écrit :
> > If I may add my 2 geeky cents, if we used a PHP-based content
> > management system, we could easily offer a PDF version of the website
> > for download, through an existing plugin (there are PDF plugins for
> > Drupal, for S
Le samedi 27 décembre 2008 à 14:28 +0100, Valentin Villenave a écrit :
> OK, then I agree too (plus it will give John one more reason to pull
> his hair out working on Texinfo stuff ;-)
Hehe, my hair is thick (and too long at my taste), so that's fine.
John
Le vendredi 26 décembre 2008 à 17:11 -0800, Graham Percival a écrit :
> That said, my initial thought is that you're right. The directory
> structure should match the website; that should make it easier to
> figure out what file to modify.
Let's go for this. I'll hack the makefiles to set this u
Le vendredi 26 décembre 2008 à 17:18 -0800, Graham Percival a écrit :
> I want to clear this up and get the first piece of new content for
> the new GOP website. With a modern version of git (whatever that
> means), what's the recommended way to get:
>
> 1. The master branch of the source tree.
2008/12/26 John Mandereau :
> The HTML used in current website is quite simple, it even doesn't have
> and elements, it won't be hard to generate it from
> texi2html. LilyPond contributors are already familiar with Texinfo, so
> it's not much of a trouble for writers either. I second Werner on
John Mandereau wrote Friday, December 26, 2008 8:18 PM
Le jeudi 25 décembre 2008 à 21:03 -0800, Graham Percival a écrit :
I currently see four options:
1) Build the website with texinfo and texi2html. With sufficient
stylesheets and texi2html hacking, I think this is /possible/, but
I don'
28 matches
Mail list logo
