On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 3:18 AM, Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> wrote: >> 4) Abandon the "complete website as pdf" idea and just give >> people a tarball of the website for off-online browsing. >> > ... >> So far I'm leaning towards #4; interested readers can still print >> the HTML directly, although the pagination will suck. And to be >> honest, it's not like the pdfs that texinfo produces are fantastic >> examples of typesetting, either. >> > > #4 seems good to me. No need to make the website in pdf form.
+1. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
