Re: make web broken in git

2008-09-17 Thread James E. Bailey
ause this script will only work with the Arch Linux distribution (using the `makepkg' package). You can checkout texi2html sources with the following command (all on one line, of course): cvs -z3 -d :pserver:anonymous:@cvs.savannah.nongnu.org:/sources/ texi2html co -D 20080917 -f texi2html

Re: make web broken in git

2008-09-17 Thread Patrick McCarty
use this script will only work with the Arch Linux distribution (using the `makepkg' package). You can checkout texi2html sources with the following command (all on one line, of course): cvs -z3 -d :pserver:anonymous:@cvs.savannah.nongnu.org:/sources/texi2html co -D 20080917 -f texi2html And

Re: make web broken in git

2008-09-17 Thread Carl D. Sorensen
Thanks, John. I missed those changes. After running autogen.sh, I ended up with a comment suggesting I install texi2html 1.79. But when I went to get texi2html, the newest version I found is 1.78. I found Patrick's script PKGBUILD at http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/texi2html-cvs/texi2html-cvs

Re: make web broken in git

2008-09-17 Thread John Mandereau
On 2008/09/17 17:12 -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: > I get errors running make web from git master. > LANG= --I=./out-www --lang=fr -I > /Users/Carl/lilypond-working/Documentation/user -I > /Users/Carl/lilypond-working/Documentation/user/./out-www -I > /Users/Carl/lilypond-working/out/xref-maps >

make web broken in git

2008-09-17 Thread Carl D. Sorensen
I get errors running make web from git master. Running on OSX 10.5, I get this error: /usr/bin/python ../../buildscripts/mass-link.py --prepend-suffix .fr hard ./out-www /Users/Carl/lilypond-working/Documentation/./out-www index.html translations.html mass-link.py make PACKAGE=LILYPOND package=li

pedal brackets, edge-width, edge-widen: ???

2008-09-17 Thread Valentin Villenave
Greetings everybody, Hi Andrew, sorry for the delay. 2008/7/1 Andrew Hawryluk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Valentin > I removed this from the Piano Pedal documentation. Do you think it's > worth including in LSR? I am thinking no, but wanted a second opinion > before it vanishes forever: > %% begin doc