The bug still remains in version 47.
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Stan Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On Jun 7, 2008, at 12:36 PM, Valentin Villenave wrote:
>
> 2008/5/2 Daniel Tonda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> From lilypond version 2.11.45 there's a bug/feature concerning beams in
This file does nothing under both 2.10 and 2.11; it appears to have
been introduced as a demonstration of backwards compatibility with
\outputproperty (there's a related regtest which also does nothing).
Is it OK to junk it completely?
Regards,
Neil
_
On Jun 7, 2008, at 12:36 PM, Valentin Villenave wrote:
2008/5/2 Daniel Tonda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
From lilypond version 2.11.45 there's a bug/feature concerning
beams in
tablature.
Hi Daniel,
sorry for having missed that; this is indeed a major regression IMO!
Added
http://code.google.c
2008/5/2 Daniel Tonda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> From lilypond version 2.11.45 there's a bug/feature concerning beams in
> tablature.
Hi Daniel,
sorry for having missed that; this is indeed a major regression IMO!
Added
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=633
Cheers,
Valentin
Ah, sorry; I really cannot effort much time at the moment. I'll be back
maybe after 20th of June or then only in July. I will be able to do
ordering and translation work (and GDP) before August, so it should make
it into the stable version. But I suggest I will take over the left part
of this r
On 2008/06/02 00:00 +0100, Neil Puttock wrote:
> 2008/6/1 John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Speaking of news, Evolution plugin "News and blogs" I use to read RSS
> > feeds doesn't manage to update the one from lilypond.org. Has anybody
> > expeienced problem with lilypond.org RSS feed? Woul
Chapter 3 in the Notation Reference is currently named "Input syntax", but
the contents in the latest revision of the 2.11 docs are much wider than the
name implies and I'd like to change it. The trouble is, the contents are
rather diverse, being mainly the left-overs from chapters 1 & 2.
Sugg
