lilypond-book: relative should imply fragment

Could we get [relative=x] to automatically imply [fragment] ? I can't imagine any possible use of [relative] where you don't want [fragment], and this would simplify the doc source by almost entirely omitting [fragment]. Cheers, - Graham ___ lilyp

Re: Index entries

2008/4/27 Valentin Villenave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Mmm... Granted, it's surprising the first time you see it; however I > kind of like it this way. Look at > http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/R5RS-Index.html > it looks surprisingly familiar :) I don't say that there is no nee

Re: Index entries

2008/4/26 Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 16:27:55 +0200 > "Francisco Vila" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I have not a word for it, actually. Is there a way to prevent > > non-alphabetic initials to have their own section? It would be better > > to group in a secti

Re: Build failure with Scheme (again)

On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 13:11:27 +0200 "Valentin Villenave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/4/26 Nicolas Sceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > While I'm at it, I was proposing to implement the category thing. > > You're welcome; the question was also whether to give the category as > an optional argu

Re: Index entries

On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 16:27:55 +0200 "Francisco Vila" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have not a word for it, actually. Is there a way to prevent > non-alphabetic initials to have their own section? It would be better > to group in a section called "symbols" all these entries, then start > with 'A' '

feedback to the latex-program option of lilypond-book

Hi John I needed immediately to try the new command line option with xelatex, and there are some smaller issues that might be interesting: for some reason xelatex when called by lilypond-book dosn't find the font index, so it has to build it every time anew itself, or just looks for the fonts

Index entries

Look at the first page of the Appendix F (or E) of the printed NR manual. I have not a word for it, actually. Is there a way to prevent non-alphabetic initials to have their own section? It would be better to group in a section called "symbols" all these entries, then start with 'A' 'B'... Yes, I

RE: Build failure with Scheme (again)

> -Original Message- > From: Nicolas Sceaux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2008 3:49 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: lily-devel; Mats Bengtsson > Subject: Re: Build failure with Scheme (again) > > Le 26 avr. 08 à 04:28, Han-Wen Nienhuys a écrit : > > > It would be co

Re: Build failure with Scheme (again)

2008/4/26 Nicolas Sceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > No, they do work as TextScript or RehearsalMark, but you have to > adapt line-width. Right! They do work as TextScripts attached to a note, but as RehearsalMarks they can go out of the page (or when they're attached to MultiMeasureRests, see issue

Re: Build failure with Scheme (again)

Le 26 avr. 08 à 13:11, Valentin Villenave a écrit : - toplevel (here we'd better put all commands that don't work inside a \score block, e.g. \fill-line, \wordwrap, \justify-string etc.) No, they do work as TextScript or RehearsalMark, but you have to adapt line-width. _

Re: Build failure with Scheme (again)

2008/4/26 Nicolas Sceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Valentin is already working on giving > > define-builtin-markup-command an extra argument for "category", Hmm, I'm not anymore right now; I'm waiting to see where this thread is going... :) > > I don't know precisely what Han-Wen and Mats were ta

Re: removing @lsr{} and only using @lsrdir{}

On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:05:40 +0200 John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sorry, why do we need a CMD? We should use the same formatting > > for all of them, so an argument-less command like [doctitle] > > should be sufficient. > > No, we certainly won't use the same formatting in Snippet

Re: Build failure with Scheme (again)

Le 26 avr. 08 à 12:21, Graham Percival a écrit : On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 12:02:03 +0200 Nicolas Sceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Le 26 avr. 08 __ 11:49, Nicolas Sceaux a __crit : Le 26 avr. 08 __ 04:28, Han-Wen Nienhuys a __crit : It would be cool if we could define the markups like (defin

Re: Build failure with Scheme (again)

On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 12:02:03 +0200 Nicolas Sceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Le 26 avr. 08 __ 11:49, Nicolas Sceaux a __crit : > > > Le 26 avr. 08 __ 04:28, Han-Wen Nienhuys a __crit : > > > >> It would be cool if we could define the markups like > >> > >> (define-markup-command (bla layout

Re: Build failure with Scheme (again)

Le 26 avr. 08 à 11:49, Nicolas Sceaux a écrit : Le 26 avr. 08 à 04:28, Han-Wen Nienhuys a écrit : It would be cool if we could define the markups like (define-markup-command (bla layout properties width arg) (number? markup?) ((line-thickness 0.0) (corner-radius 0.2)) .. ) where this

Re: Build failure with Scheme (again)

Le 26 avr. 08 à 04:28, Han-Wen Nienhuys a écrit : It would be cool if we could define the markups like (define-markup-command (bla layout properties width arg) (number? markup?) ((line-thickness 0.0) (corner-radius 0.2)) .. ) where this defines that the bla command uses line-thicknes

Re: lybook-db and make xxx-clean

On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 23:12:26 +1000 "Joe Neeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:57 PM, John Mandereau > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Incomplete test-clean and web-clean can be cumbersome when you're > > working on C++ code, but it's very useful when you don't want to >