Hi Werner,
The chord font seems to be messed up after the mf2pt1 change. The
letter "m" and "s" is chosen from the dynamic font (see attached
picture). Can you reproduce this? I guess you can fix this pretty
quick :-)
Best regards,
Erlend
<>
<>
__
> Just curious, will these changes propagate to upstream? Or are we
> effectively forking mf2pt1 ?
Scott has already submitted a new version to CTAN which contains this
fix (and which I'll import to the lilypond repository as soon as it is
available). Normally, I won't apply such fixes immediatel
Shure, no problem. I'll try to remember to document my commits better
from now on.
E
On 30. jan. 2008, at 01:12, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Hi Erlend,
could you be a little more verbose in your messages?
**
Fix issue 558
**
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/
Just curious, will these changes propagate to upstream? Or are we
effectively forking mf2pt1 ?
Author: Werner Lemberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-26 00:42:35
Committer: Werner Lemberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-26 00:42:35
Branches: master, origin
Follows: release/2.11.37-1
Precedes:
mf2p
Hi Erlend,
could you be a little more verbose in your messages?
**
Fix issue 558
**
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/list
> > I strongly suggest to use those fonts, and I'm willing to update
> > lilypond so that they get included and used.
>
> Sounds great! Go for it!
OK.
> > PS: Two questions in case you think the above is a good idea:
> > Shall we distribute SVG and PFB versions of TeXGyreSchola?
>
> Since
> > Good question. Han-Wen, is there still a reason why we distribute
> > the PFB versions?
>
> Do we? I thought we only distributed the OTFs, although a regular
> install (through make) might install them for completeness sake.
> Definitely something we can junk.
OK. As soon as [1] is fixed, I
2008/1/28, Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Cyrillic block have been fixed). As an additional benefit, the fonts
> are directly available as full-featured OpenType fonts (this is, they
> come with a large bunch of OpenType features). While the metrics are
> slightly different (due to improve
2008/1/28, Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > What use would the pfb fonts have?
>
> Good question. Han-Wen, is there still a reason why we distribute the
> PFB versions?
Do we? I thought we only distributed the OTFs, although a regular
install (through make) might install them for completen
2008/1/27, Juergen Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > The ligature events are implemented as 'command-event', like \bar and
> > \time, which fall in between the notes.This is inconsistent with
> > start/stop commands like [ ] , but I can't really judge if that is the
> > best way to do it.
>
> Hmm
2008/1/28, Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > You can insert any UTF-8 character and LilyPond will render it as
> > long as Pango can find a font installed on your system that includes
> > a glyph for that symbol. Pango also handles kerning and ligatures
> > automatically, if the font(s) you
2008/1/29, Valentin Villenave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Oh yes! as a matter of fact, the whole "\times 2/3" is included in my
> \t variable.
>
> Maybe the whole point is that users cannot define their own alias
> here. Would it be consistent to make it possible, by removing the
> hardcoded \times key
2008/1/27, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Would this aliasing include a convert-ly rule, or not? That's
> > > going to be impossible to resolve.
> >
> > I favour a convert-ly rule. Why not?
>
> If we "officially" allow the old \times command as an alias, then
> people who want to keep
2008/1/29, David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Encouraging aliasing for basic functionality is a bad idea since it
> impacts the portability of document fragments and thus encumbers the
> usefulness of Mutopia and similar sites for score interchange and
> adaptations.
But Mutopia files are alread
2008/1/29, Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The problem is (as was discussed in that thread that we are repeating
> more and
> more of here) that you cannot create any such alias, at least not if you
> want to
> keep the syntax 2/3. You can certainly make an alias with syntax
> \t #2 #3 {musi
Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Valentin Villenave wrote:
>
>> Maybe we should just explain as a commonprop how to easily create an
>> alias for the \times keyword, so that the users can be free to choose
>> whatever they want.
>>
> The problem is (as was discussed in that thread t
Valentin Villenave wrote:
2008/1/28, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
... hmm, I admit that it's annoying that your right hand needs to
hit the \ and then m keys; \tuplet has the advantage of using the
left hand for the t...
Definitely.
A year ago, I proposed to use the simple,
2008/1/28, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> ... hmm, I admit that it's annoying that your right hand needs to
> hit the \ and then m keys; \tuplet has the advantage of using the
> left hand for the t...
Definitely.
A year ago, I proposed to use the simple, minimalistic \t keyword that
is b
18 matches
Mail list logo