2008/1/28, Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > What use would the pfb fonts have? > > Good question. Han-Wen, is there still a reason why we distribute the > PFB versions?
Do we? I thought we only distributed the OTFs, although a regular install (through make) might install them for completeness sake. Definitely something we can junk. >Except feta-alphabet[1] they aren't directly used. > [1] This is something I consider a bug. I can't see a reason to use > feta-alphabet separately since the glyphs are already in the > emmentaler font. It's sheer laziness. The font-selection for (IIRC) time-signature and dynamic glyphs still uses the font-encoding property (with values fetaNumber / fetaDynamic). There used to be a reason for this, but it may have disappeared by now. Feel free to fix this. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
