> Regarding the accents, I'm a bit confused still. Why don't you
> simply plug in the existing accent symbol by setting a couple of
> callbacks ?
For me, the accents sitting *on* a note line appear too fat due to
smearing.
Werner
___
lilypond-de
> Werner - We tried exactly that and the result was optically that
> notes in a staffspace (and that therefore connect to an adjacent
> staffline) appear a bit larger than notes on a staffline (that
> therefore do not connect to an adjacent staffline).
You mean vertically?
> The gap was an attem
Trevor Bača wrote:
However, is it still the case that the reference pages are produce
automatically by snarfing the source?
Yes.
If so, how can we add by-hand authorial comments to the ref pages?
I'm not aware of any such mechanism. If you could suggest anywhere in
the main docs to put th
Trevor Bača wrote:
Could I suggest the following verbatim change to 11.1.2 "Page formatting"?
Thanks, added.
Cheers,
- Graham
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
2007/4/3, Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> BTW, the 'marcato' glyph (which I used as guideline for the design)
> doesn't have this correction. Is this intended?
Yes, since it is never positioned on staff lines.
No, this incorrect. The problem is that with equal lines, the junction
(for t
2007/4/3, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In the attached PDF I see that there is sometimes a small white gap
> between a note line and the base of the triangle. I consider this
> bad. IMHO, both the top and base of the triangle should slightly
> overlap with the note lines (this is, they sh
On 4/3/07, Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> here are patches (contain metafont source and doc additions) for the
> other kind of notehead requested by Trevor and Jamie some time
> ago. They implement two slightly differing styles, namely
> 'outward-pointing' and 'inward-pointing' tria
> here are patches (contain metafont source and doc additions) for the
> other kind of notehead requested by Trevor and Jamie some time
> ago. They implement two slightly differing styles, namely
> 'outward-pointing' and 'inward-pointing' triangles. [...]
In the attached PDF I see that there is
Hi everyone,
here are patches (contain metafont source and doc additions) for the
other kind of notehead requested by Trevor and Jamie some time ago. They
implement two slightly differing styles, namely 'outward-pointing' and
'inward-pointing' triangles. This means that the tips of the triangles
e
> BTW, the 'marcato' glyph (which I used as guideline for the design)
> doesn't have this correction. Is this intended?
Yes, since it is never positioned on staff lines.
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> Everything looks very nice! However, I suggest that the inner side of
> the right part of the glyph is drawn a bit slimmer, similar to the `>'
> `sforzato' glyph, which has an optical correction to avoid excessive
> `smearing'.
BTW, the 'marcato' glyph (which I used as gu
Werner LEMBERG schrieb:
> Everything looks very nice! However, I suggest that the inner side of
> the right part of the glyph is drawn a bit slimmer, similar to the `>'
> `sforzato' glyph, which has an optical correction to avoid excessive
> `smearing'.
Thanks for the hint, I hadn't noticed this
Hi Graham, hi Werner and Joe,
On 4/3/07, Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How are VerticalAxisGroup and VerticalAlignment supposed to
> > differ? Is one slated for deprecation?
>
> Not as far as I know. A VerticalAxisGroup is just a way to group
> together lots of grobs which are th
Hi Graham,
Could I suggest the following verbatim change to 11.1.2 "Page formatting"?
There are three small changes:
1. The introduction of a "Commonly tweaked properties" section to
introduce ly/paper-defaults.ly and ly/titling-init.ly.
2. The move of the "Example" section immediately followi
> > How are VerticalAxisGroup and VerticalAlignment supposed to
> > differ? Is one slated for deprecation?
>
> Not as far as I know. A VerticalAxisGroup is just a way to group
> together lots of grobs which are then aligned vertically (by the
> VerticalAlignment) as though they were one grob. Ther
> here is a patch for a new accent-shaped notehead, as requested by
> Jamie and Trevor on this list a while ago. An example of what it
> looks like is attached. Would it be possibe to include this in the
> next development release? The second patch is to update the docs.
Everything looks very
16 matches
Mail list logo
