Yep, you are right. I added windows style line endings to the original file,
then ran 'diff -u' again and got this smaller file.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Johannes Schindelin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Han-Wen Nienhuys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "l
Not to be argumentative, but in UE repeated notes within a measure only have
the natural on the first note, so there still is a rule stating that not all
notes get a natural or accidental. I have Schoenberg Suite Fur Klavier op.
25. I think the naturals are to remind us players who are used to
I've extracted the info from the file, but there was one problem: you're
doing this on windows, which uses a different End-Of-Line character(s)
ah, I see. my editor can save in the unix format too. will try the next
time. thx for the hint.
Pity it didn't arrived in time for version 2.6.0...
On 27-Jun-05, at 11:52 AM, VSD wrote:
Graham, find attached the new patch for "titling-init.ly". I'm not
very used to the gnu tools, is it usable?
I've extracted the info from the file, but there was one problem: you're
doing this on windows, which uses a different End-Of-Line character(s)
tha
- "printpagenumber" should work again. if ##f, no page number is printed
at all. if ##t the pagenumbers are printed starting from "pagenumber",
and the first page ("1" by default or "pagenumber"if set) is printed or
not according to the value of "printfirstpagenumber".
If there's no more prob
Hi,
Graham, find attached the new patch for "titling-init.ly". I'm not very
used to the gnu tools, is it usable?
Pity it didn't arrived in time for version 2.6.0...
:ยด(
The changes:
- "printpagenumber" should work again. if ##f, no page number is printed
at all. if ##t the page numbers ar
Using environment variables in Windows is generally unsupported I think.
So I'd also prefer using the registry and the user's file associations
instead, setting a default one if there is nothing set.
Bert
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-dev
> "LC" == Laura Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
HN> abcusers@argyll.wisemagic.com
LC> Done.
Except that I should have pointed out that the current address is
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
--
Laura (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] , http://www.laymusic.org/ )
(617) 661-8097 fax: (501) 641-5011
2
> > here's a small suggestion for something I'd like to see in the windows
> > port of Lilypond: when an editor window is opened (for example, when
> > the user double-clicks on the Lilypond icon on the desktop), then
> > instead of opening Notepad, the editor that's associated with the file
> > ty
Hi,
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=280352
Debian developer Jonas Smedegaard is looking for the bugs Lilypond 2.6
and other programs expose in Ghostscript. If I understand correctly, he
needs these as arguments for a non-maintainer upload of a newer gs-gpl
package to the offi
> "HN" == Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
HN>abcusers@argyll.wisemagic.com
Done.
--
Laura (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] , http://www.laymusic.org/ )
(617) 661-8097 fax: (501) 641-5011
233 Broadway, Cambridge, MA 02139
___
Schneelocke writes:
> here's a small suggestion for something I'd like to see in the windows
> port of Lilypond: when an editor window is opened (for example, when
> the user double-clicks on the Lilypond icon on the desktop), then
> instead of opening Notepad, the editor that's associated with th
Hi all,
Just to let you know I just filed the following Debian wishlist bug on
Lilypond 2.6. I hope Thomas will find some spare time to get it into
Debian soon.
-
Package: lilypond
Version: 2.4.5-2
Severity: wishlist
Lilypond 2.6 is available. There are lots of enhancements t
Hi,
here's a small suggestion for something I'd like to see in the windows
port of Lilypond: when an editor window is opened (for example, when
the user double-clicks on the Lilypond icon on the desktop), then
instead of opening Notepad, the editor that's associated with the file
type being opened
Hi,
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Stephen wrote:
> OK, I guess I know that and know why. I was resisting because a unified
> patch is larger than the original file. But I am guessing now that that is
> what the "unified" means, containing all of the original file.
The patch seems to be so large only beca
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
>> tuurlijk alleen x86, iets van:
>>any version of Linux (x86 only).
>>
>
> putting the new resolutions regarding foreign tongues into practice
> directly, eh?
>
> :)
Oops I did it again :-)
Sorry.
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - Th
OK, I guess I know that and know why. I was resisting because a unified
patch is larger than the original file. But I am guessing now that that is
what the "unified" means, containing all of the original file.
Like I said, I already made the patch and decided not to send it, so here it
is.
S
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
+ Version 2.6 is the latest stable release of LilyPond. It now
+installs in a snap on Windows, MacOS X, and any version of Linux.
tuurlijk alleen x86, iets van:
any version of Linux (x86 only).
putting the new resolutions regarding f
Hi Guys,
I could use some help with spreading the lily 2.6 announcement
(attached). I've already posted it to
info-lilypond@gnu.org
comp.music.research
comp.os.linux.announce
comp.text.tex,rec.music.compose
freshmeat.net
can someone post it to the foll
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> + Version 2.6 is the latest stable release of LilyPond. It now
> +installs in a snap on Windows, MacOS X, and any version of Linux.
tuurlijk alleen x86, iets van:
any version of Linux (x86 only).
?
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The mu
Mark Van den Borre writes:
> Not that it matters so much, but there are two small errors in the
> Debian package versions on the Lilypond download page:
>
> * Lilypond 2.4.5 is in Debian etch, the current testing, and in Debian
> sid.
> * Lilypond 2.2.6 ships with Debian sarge, but it's not in Deb
Bertalan Fodor writes:
> I ask here, because I couldn't figure it out. I get a message:
>
> make[2]: *** No rule to make target
> /netrel/build/lilypond-2.5.31/cygwin/out/postinstall-lilypond.sh',
> needed by `default'. Stop.
>
> I can't see any problems in the cygwin makefile, so I don't know wh
Am 27.06.05 schrieb Mats Bengtsson:
> I would suspect some installation problem. You didn't tell
> how you installed the program and what platform you use.
My system is based on a SuSE 9.0 on i386, but with a lot of upgrades.
These packages might be relevant:
Freetype 2.1.9 including TrueType h
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
is possibly understandable for those of us who already know
the answer, but if you want more patches floating in, it would
be well worth the effort to spend 5 more minutes to write a more
informative instruction.
Patches gratefully accepted! The sources to the website ar
Graham Percival wrote:
CVSROOT:/cvsroot/lilypond
Module name:lilypond
Branch:
Changes by: Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/06/23 16:53:47
...
diff -u lilypond/Documentation/user/examples.itely:1.38
lilypond/Documentation/user/examples.itely:1.39
--- lil
I would suspect some installation problem. You didn't tell
how you installed the program and what platform you use.
Also, you might get a more informative error message to send
to the mailing list if you run
lilypond --verbose test.ly
/Mats
Werner Scheinast wrote:
Hi,
when I want to parse a
Please Han-Wen, at least provide a link to some information on the
prefered format and how to obtain it in practice. Beleive me,
this could be a major problem if you have never submitted a
patch before.
The information at http://lilypond.org/web/devel/participating/
is possibly understandable for
Brynne and Russ Jorgensen writes:
> Is a python interpreter supposed to be part of the lilypond
> distribution on windows?
No. Although python is a highly portable package, it does not support
automatic configuration, specific feature tests or cross compiling.
Before we can ship python, a mingw
Brynne and Russ Jorgensen writes:
>> Caller (eg, lilypad.scm) can then decide what to do. Does this work
>> for you?
>>
>
> I don't have a strong opinion either way, so if you think it's better
> to keep two executables, I'm definitely supportive.
This is now all post-2.6, but it would be nice
Brynne and Russ Jorgensen writes:
> When I run lilypond from the desktop, it does not start up lilypad
> with the Welcome_to_LilyPond.ly file. However, if I start a command
> shell, cd to the LilyPond usr\bin directory and then run lilypond, it
> DOES start up lilypad. I thought it was a problem
30 matches
Mail list logo
