Re: removing unwanted accidentals

2005-04-16 Thread Graham Percival
On 16-Apr-05, at 7:34 AM, Stephen wrote: The problem appears when you put all the movements together **under the same score**. I consider this to be a midi bug. If you put each movement in its own score, all your engraving problems would disapear, the movements would appear as they do in the sep

Re: removing unwanted accidentals

2005-04-16 Thread Stephen
Attatched is a version or act1.ly, act1_.ly, that puts the final movement in its own score block. I know you may not want to put each movement in its own score, but lilypond expects this by default and notice how all the problems associated with doing it as you have it set up disappear. Stephen

Patch: small tweak to \betweenLilyPondSystem

2005-04-16 Thread Bernard Hurley
Added to Changelog: 2005-04-17 Bernard Hurley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * scm/framework-eps: When \betweenLilyPondSystem is defined systems are in separate paragraphs. Rationale: Some LaTeX commands do not take effect until the end of the paragraph - in this case after all the syst

Re: removing unwanted accidentals

2005-04-16 Thread Bernard Hurley
I can't think of a situation where anyone except a beginner who didn't understand the philosopy behind lllypond would want to use a "no-accidental" style. OTOH it is useful to have workarounds for bugs. \noAccidental seems ideal for this. It is not as cumbersome as having to change the accidental-s

Re: Implementation documentation

2005-04-16 Thread Bernard Hurley
> What's an Implementation documenter? Is this providing documentation > for programmers? > > Cheers, > - Graham > Yes, so that programmers can find their way around the code. I'm not sure that "Implementation Documenter" is that best term to use, but I can't think of a better one at present. T

Re: How to Hide stave with \partial 4 r4

2005-04-16 Thread Mats Bengtsson
I forward the feature request (or maybe it should be seen as a bug report) at the end of this email to lilypond-devel. /Mats Karl Hammar wrote: On 1-Apr-05, at 12:38 PM, Karl Hammar wrote: If I use \partial 4 R1*1/4, it will work in the full score, but it gives me a lot of: Music.23.ly:10:18:

Re: removing unwanted accidentals

2005-04-16 Thread Karl Hammar
> Citerar Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I think we want Lilypond to continue to follow standard practive. If we give > > users the ability to violate those rules then total novices will start > > making mistakes. > > We don't have to document the feature in a way such that novices will be ab

Re: removing unwanted accidentals

2005-04-16 Thread Karl Hammar
> Karl, > > The problem appears when you put all the movements together **under the same > score**. I consider this to be a midi bug. No, the unwanted accidentals are still there if I remove the midi block. > If you put each movement in its > own score, all your engraving problems would disap

Re: removing unwanted accidentals

2005-04-16 Thread Karl Hammar
> Citerar Karl Hammar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: ... > > > \version "2.4.0" > > > > > > #(define-public (print-+100-text-callback grob) > > > (let* ( ;(text (ly:grob-property grob 'text)) > > > (text (number->string (+ 100 (string->number (ly:grob-property > > grob > > > 'text) > > >

Re: Implementation documentation

2005-04-16 Thread Graham Percival
On 14-Apr-05, at 5:01 AM, Bernard Hurley wrote: I have somewhat rashly volunteered to be Implementation documenter. Han-Wen informs me that various abortive starts have already been made on this. So if you have any material that would be useful, please e-mail it to me. What's an Implementation doc

Re: removing unwanted accidentals

2005-04-16 Thread Erik Sandberg
Citerar Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I think we want Lilypond to continue to follow standard practive. If we give > users the ability to violate those rules then total novices will start > making mistakes. We don't have to document the feature in a way such that novices will be able to use it.

Re: removing unwanted accidentals

2005-04-16 Thread Erik Sandberg
Citerar Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I'm changing my mind about syntax - I think the best way would be to have a new accidental style called no-accidentals, which would suppress all accidentals except on notes with !. This is probably trivial to implement (but I don't have the src here). Erik >

Re: removing unwanted accidentals

2005-04-16 Thread Erik Sandberg
Citerar Karl Hammar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Friday 15 April 2005 10.56, Karl Hammar wrote: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > > It also changes the numbering of all subsequent bars. I don't know the > > > > author's intent in this case (I didn't write that snippet), but I > guess > > > > it cou

Re: abc2ly no longer translates second T: line correctly

2005-04-16 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Use text markup! /Mats Laura Conrad wrote: Former versions of abc2ly appended a second title line to the title header line, with "", which used to translate to a line break, between the lines. This no longer seems to work (current cvs). I haven't figured how you get a line break in the t

abc2ly no longer translates second T: line correctly

2005-04-16 Thread Laura Conrad
Former versions of abc2ly appended a second title line to the title header line, with "", which used to translate to a line break, between the lines. This no longer seems to work (current cvs). I haven't figured how you get a line break in the title these days; if someone tells me, I could

Re: abc2ly problem with lilypond-snapshot

2005-04-16 Thread Laura Conrad
> "LC" == Laura Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: LC> This ABC file that I reported problems with on 2.4.2 also has problems LC> on current (2005-04-16 Han-Wen Nienhuys) CVS. This one was a user error. Sorry. -- Laura (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] , http://www.laymusic.org/ ) (617)

Debuild error

2005-04-16 Thread Laura Conrad
This is in current (ChangeLog 2005-04-16 Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) CVS, on Debian unstable, with gs 8.14. The command was "debuild -B". debuild.log Description: Binary data ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://li

make install error

2005-04-16 Thread Laura Conrad
Current (2005-04-16 Han-Wen Nienhuys) CVS, make ran without errors, but "make install" produces the following: install.log Description: Binary data ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-

Programming errors when processing abc2ly output

2005-04-16 Thread Laura Conrad
For the attached file, when I run abc2ly, and then lilypond, I get a lot of errors that say: programming error: Infinity or NaN encountered The lilypond output is as you would expect. cantus.abc Description: Binary data -- Laura (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] , http://www.laymusic.org/ ) (617) 6

abc2ly problem with lilypond-snapshot

2005-04-16 Thread Laura Conrad
This ABC file that I reported problems with on 2.4.2 also has problems on current (2005-04-16 Han-Wen Nienhuys) CVS. The abc file is attached. It looks like there's something wrong with markup on multi-voice music. Abc2ly-snapshot says: [solo5]# abc2ly-snapshot test.abc /usr/bin/abc2ly-snapsh

Re: abc2ly key translation problem in current cvs

2005-04-16 Thread Laura Conrad
This problem report on 2.4.2 is still a problem in current CVS. > "LC" == Laura Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: LC> The attached abc file is in G minor, so it should print with a key LC> signature of two flats. When I use Pedro's abc2ly-snapshot, 2.4.2, LC> there's no key sign

Re: removing unwanted accidentals

2005-04-16 Thread Stephen
Karl, The problem appears when you put all the movements together **under the same score**. I consider this to be a midi bug. If you put each movement in its own score, all your engraving problems would disapear, the movements would appear as they do in the separate scores. The midi files would

Re: configure and guile

2005-04-16 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Laura Conrad writes: > No, it's 2.5.19. Ok. You're seeing problems that are fixed in CVS. I just tried, and succceeded in make web with gs 8.01. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org

'make all' failure ChangeLog 1.3441

2005-04-16 Thread David Bobroff
I reported a 'make all' failure earlier. Now I'm getting a different exit error: all-font-metrics.cc:36: error: `pango_ft2_font_map_set_resolution' undeclared (first use this function) all-font-metrics.cc: In destructor `All_font_metrics::~All_font_metrics ()': all-font-metrics.cc:52: error: `pa

Re: Here is the patch

2005-04-16 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Op za, 16-04-2005 te 12:41 +0100, schreef Bernard Hurley: > Added to changelog: > > 2005-04-16 Bernard Hurley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * framework-eps.scm: code added so that a macro \betweenLilyPondSystem > with one parameter can be defined in a LaTeX file when processed >

Re: lilypond book issues version 2.5.19

2005-04-16 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Op za, 16-04-2005 te 10:09 +0100, schreef Bernard Hurley: > Lilypond makes a good job of deciding breaks between systems, once this > is done page breaks are easy again I might want them to follow the > general format of the rest of my document, which does not only contain > music, but contains fi

Here is the patch

2005-04-16 Thread Bernard Hurley
Added to changelog: 2005-04-16 Bernard Hurley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * framework-eps.scm: code added so that a macro \betweenLilyPondSystem with one parameter can be defined in a LaTeX file when processed by lilypond-book this will be evaluated between the systems of

Re: configure and guile

2005-04-16 Thread Laura Conrad
> "JN" == Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JN> Laura Conrad writes: >> Here's what happened. Now what? It isn't at all clear that this has >> anything to do with the gs version. JN> Is this latest CVS? I'm afraid that I cannot build with gs-8.01, and JN> I

Re: lilypond book issues version 2.5.19

2005-04-16 Thread Bernard Hurley
On Sat, 2005-04-16 at 01:08 +0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > > When called from lilypond-book, LilyPond does _not_ take care of > > formatting the pages. This is precisely the reason I started using it. > > So that I can have a multi-movement score with fancy headers, table of > > contents, etc. Wh

'make all' fails ChangeLog 1.3439

2005-04-16 Thread David Bobroff
I had a strange thing happen with my Fedora Core 3 system. It was filled with filesystem inconsistencies and did not seem to be able to repair itself. I have reinstalled it (I managed not to lose my data) and tried to compile CVS again. I ran down the list of requirements for compiling and I thi

Re: configure and guile

2005-04-16 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Laura Conrad writes: > Here's what happened. Now what? It isn't at all clear that this has > anything to do with the gs version. Is this latest CVS? I'm afraid that I cannot build with gs-8.01, and I can with gs-8.50 (from CVS). I'm trying gs-afpl-8.14 now. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAI