Re: urg.

2005-02-18 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> * We can hack fontconfig support into Ghostscript 8.15, pray that all > distros start shipping it and have GS load the fonts. > > A nice solution, but a logistic nightmare? I suspect that this > might be the easiest route technically, though. I vote for that. It has the additional adva

Doc reorganization

2005-02-18 Thread Graham Percival
I'm planning a reorganization of the manual. First, to keep discussion focused and useful: I'm currently only interested in chapters, sections, and the order they appear in the manual. Extra comments, such as "the docs for lyrics need to be improved" or "we need way more docs for drums" will be i

urg.

2005-02-18 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
I've been working on direct PDF output. The basis (objects, byte offsets) is easy enough, but * Type1 fonts have to embedded binarily. * Type1 fonts have to be interpreted to extract glyph widths (with freetype?) * The Type1 has to be read, to determine byte offsets of different sections

Re: rfc: basic color support

2005-02-18 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Ok, here's what I've got for now (this also includes the layer.patch). > Synced with cvs. ChangeLog entry added. > > I've put the color macros in output-lib.scm, ok? > > Med venleg helsing > Erlend applied. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http:

Re: rfc: basic color support

2005-02-18 Thread Erlend Aasland
Ok, here's what I've got for now (this also includes the layer.patch). Synced with cvs. ChangeLog entry added. I've put the color macros in output-lib.scm, ok? Med venleg helsing Erlend P.S.: I'll be away for a week (so I can't reply in case there is something wrong with my patch) On Fri, 18

Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested

2005-02-18 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: Bertalan Fodor writes: I made the tests: 1. purge c:\cygwin 2. install old lilypond-2.4.2-1 with default settings - OK (this is the test that that makes many user problem inexplicable) :-) 3. install lilypond-2.4.3-1 (built against tetex-2.0) - OK 4. install tetex-3.0

Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested

2005-02-18 Thread Bertalan Fodor
FAIL2 ec-fonts are not found Solution: updmap --enable Map=/usr/share/texmf/dvips/ec-fonts-mftraced/ec-mftrace.map I'm not sure how to overcome this in the packages How about adding this to lilypond? Ok. I looked at /sauter-fonts-mftraced/GNUmakefile I see: # FIXME

Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested

2005-02-18 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Bertalan Fodor writes: > I made the tests: > > 1. purge c:\cygwin > 2. install old lilypond-2.4.2-1 with default settings - OK (this is >the test that that makes many user problem inexplicable) :-) > 3. install lilypond-2.4.3-1 (built against tetex-2.0) - OK > 4. install tetex-3.0.0-1 > FAIL

Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested

2005-02-18 Thread Bertalan Fodor
I made the tests: 1. purge c:\cygwin 2. install old lilypond-2.4.2-1 with default settings - OK (this is the test that that makes many user problem inexplicable) 3. install lilypond-2.4.3-1 (built against tetex-2.0) - OK 4. install tetex-3.0.0-1 FAIL1 Invoking `latex \\nonstopmode \\input 1.te

Re: rfc: basic color support

2005-02-18 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 23:45:17 +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > BTW, I would propose to use a function to abstract the color format > > for now, ie > > > > (define color? list?) > > (define (rgb r g b) (list r g b)) > I agree. Just a thought: wo