[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 23:45:17 +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > BTW, I would propose to use a function to abstract the color format > > for now, ie > > > > (define color? list?) > > (define (rgb r g b) (list r g b)) > I agree. Just a thought: would it be a good idea to only allow just a > predefined set of colors: b/w, red, green, blue, cyan, magenta etc... > Users wouldn't notice if we changed the internal representation of > colors. > > (define red '(1.0 0.0 0.0)) (define blue .... etc...
Yes, please go ahead. Can you send a patch with all changes collected and a input/regression/ test? thanks! -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
