[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> On Aug 2, 2004, at 9:59 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >> While 2.3.10 builds fine and seems to produce correct output, I get
> >> many instances of the following warning:
> >>
> >> programming error: Improbable offset for translation:
On Aug 2, 2004, at 9:59 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
While 2.3.10 builds fine and seems to produce correct output, I get
many instances of the following warning:
programming error: Improbable offset for translation: setting to zero,
Continuing; crossing fingers
Matthias
.ly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> While 2.3.10 builds fine and seems to produce correct output, I get
> many instances of the following warning:
>
> programming error: Improbable offset for translation: setting to zero,
> Continuing; crossing fingers
>
> Matthias
.ly sample please.
--
Han-Wen Ni
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> If I add \notes, the problem remains:
>
> spark-daemonology-net:~/tmp gperciva$ more foo.lytex
> \documentclass[article]
> \begin{document}
> Test normal LaTeX text.
> \begin{lilypond}
> \score{ \notes {\relative c' { c2 c }}}
> \end{lilypond}
> \end{document}
> spark-d
On Aug 1, 2004, at 6:08 PM, Matthias Neeracher wrote:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Benjamin Esham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | paper output to `newworld.ps'...
> | warning: lily-guile: Can't find PFA font "ecbx10"
> | warning: lily-guile: Can't find PFA font "ecbx12"
> | warning: lily-guile:
On 2-Aug-04, at 1:47 AM, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Try to add a \notes directive, to get correct LilyPond input
code in your example.
That appears to be a change in 2.3.9 -- no \notes. At least,
convert-ly removed the \notes from my files, and they build
using lilypond (non-book).
If I add \notes, the
It turned out the Han-Wen had just renamed some files and forgot
to do the corresponding changes in some other files.
I have fixed the problem in CVS.
There are still a number of outdated file references in the
po/* files, which I didn't fix.
/Mats
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
I get the same here, it s
I get the same here, it seems that we happened to download the files
while Han-Wen or Jan are in the middle of some reorganisation of the
code. Usually, they fix it in a couple of hours, especially now that
you have reported the problem.
/Mats
Ralph Little wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to compile CVS f
Hi,
I am trying to compile CVS for the first time so that I can put together
some patch contributions.
I'm having lots of probs.
I have checked out the current version, run autoconf.sh and make all and
I get some errors.
I think I have all the pre-requisites.
First, I get a problem in lilypond/el
Try to add a \notes directive, to get correct LilyPond input
code in your example.
/Mats
Graham Percival wrote:
lilypond-book doesn't work with a simple test file:
spark-daemonology-net:~/tmp gperciva$ more foo.lytex
\documentclass[article]
\begin{document}
Test normal LaTeX text.
\begin{lilypon
While 2.3.10 builds fine and seems to produce correct output, I get
many instances of the following warning:
programming error: Improbable offset for translation: setting to zero,
Continuing; crossing fingers
Matthias
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
11 matches
Mail list logo