Bonjour Jan!
Wed, 26 May 2004 21:56:10 +0200, tu as dit :
> Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
>> Also, we will run into platform dependencies. I fear that we might
>> need libtool to build the shared lib portably.
> We might, but we'll worry later, if necessary. A --disable-shared
> configure opti
Hi folks,
[it's a long email, sorry]
As you know I started a new "branch" in the debian package. It's based
on the previous work by Fok but I deleted the unnecessary stuff (like
specific code for lily 1.3 and 1.7 for example) and made it
"independent" of the stable one, i.e., you can have both in
Hi,
I have been asking a few packagers to update their stable
packages. For instance, the latest FreeBSD package is 2.1.22 instead
of 2.2.1. The few I contacted said they would be happy to update as
soon as possible, given their limited time. that's just fine.
Should I nag^H^H^Hask them to packag
Wed, 26 May 2004 11:23:38 +0200, tu a dit :
> Nicolas Sceaux writes:
>> I was experimenting this week end with lilypond called directly from
>> scheme (without using lilypond-bin).
> That's interesting. If you want I can help with install rules, but we
> should figure out what to put in th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > to a Scheme list.
> >
> > * The diagram items include settings for linethickness, height,
> >width, etc.
> >
> >It would be better style to put these settings into properties, so
> >you could do
> >
> >\translator { \StaffContext
> > \
I've attached Joshua (zz85)'s lilymode.xml
My notes:
I think that when notes are colored then all notes in all languages should
be colored but nothing in lyrics. I think that this is impossible to
achieve, so I wouldn't colorize note names. However, having the rests and
skips be emphasized and th
(resending, forgot to cc to list)
On Thursday 27 May 2004 00.30, you wrote:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> > We could store them, but we have to divert energy into maintaining
> > that list, which is a waste IMO. Also, past experience with TODO lists
> > shows that they tend to fill up with useless
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Hi,
>
> the subject says all. (I have guile 1.6). Here is what I get:
>
> --
> /usr/bin/python ../scripts/lilypond.py --output=out-www/simple.dvi simple.ly
> lilypond2.3 (GNU LilyPond) @TOPLEV
* Jan Nieuwenhuizen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> You should already have write access, can you try? Problem is that
> you currently need to notify Han-Wen or me to get it installed (from
> CVS). We may want to automate that with a cron job.
Should I notify you guys privately or through the maili
* Han-Wen Nienhuys ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> it looks as if you didn't rebuild the binary.
yep, I did. But it was my fault anyway. I was patching the scripts at
lilypond/scripts (to be able to run "lilypond2.3" and the like)
*before* the compilation. Now I'll do it after the compilation and in
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> We could store them, but we have to divert energy into maintaining
> that list, which is a waste IMO. Also, past experience with TODO lists
> shows that they tend to fill up with useless requests. I concur with
> Mats that the mailing list is much better inspiration for
11 matches
Mail list logo
