<>
___
Lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
<>
___
Lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Cya
<>
___
Lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
<>
___
Lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
The following link has virus details to what I suspect has been flooding
lilypond email lists lately. I am only assuming since I have no up to date
antivirus system to test them against right now. Confirmations appreciated.
Reading the following page can help educate windows users about the v
> I'm ambivalent. The danger is that the number of functions to create
> and manipulate data structures explodes, and becomes harder to
> learn. We have to find a balance between having a small "interface"
> and an interface that is ultra-ergonomic to use.
I think at the moment that Lilypond is a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Sat, 28 Feb 2004, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > >
> > > Why not to have commands \arpeggioup and \arpeggiodown?
> > > They would be handy.
> >
> > Go ahead.
> > Please consider the capitalization standards, though.
>
> I made functions
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> > Why not to have commands \arpeggioup and \arpeggiodown?
> > They would be handy.
>
> Go ahead.
> Please consider the capitalization standards, though.
I made functions \arpeggioUp, \arpeggioDown, \arpeggioBoth and
\a
<>
___
Lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
<>
___
Lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
<>
___
Lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
<>
___
Lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
<>
___
Lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
<>
___
Lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
<>
___
Lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
<>
___
Lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Everything inside the attach
<>
___
Lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
<>
___
Lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I haven't updated convert-ly (not sure about it). Maybe something like
> that should be added (?)
>
> def conv (str):
> str = re.sub ('make-music-by-name', 'make-music',str)
> return str
>
> conversions.append (((2,1,), conv, """More Scheme function
<>
___
Lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
> We could also generate dummy .txt files to satisfy makeinfo 4.6.
Please do so. The less latest-version-or-newer packages are needed,
the better. lilypond already needs too much packages to work.
Werner
___
Lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL P
> Here is a patch for a new make-music definition.
I forgot a (use-modules (ice-9 optargs)) on top of
music-functions.scm. There is no error, though, as it is present in
new-markups.scm.
___
Lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.
Here is a patch for a new make-music definition.
I was not sure about what to do with the former make-music-by-name
definition, so it is still in define-music-types.scm (after
make-music), with a deprecation warning. Maybe this should be
removed.
One more time, I messed with indentation, adding r
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Sat, 28 Feb 2004 11:53:15 +0100, Han-Wen a dit :
>
> > I'm ambivalent. The danger is that the number of functions to create
> > and manipulate data structures explodes, and becomes harder to
> > learn. We have to find a balance between having a small "interface"
>
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 11:53:15 +0100, Han-Wen a dit :
> I'm ambivalent. The danger is that the number of functions to create
> and manipulate data structures explodes, and becomes harder to
> learn. We have to find a balance between having a small "interface"
> and an interface that is ultra-ergon
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 11:57:00 +0100, Jan a dit :
> Doing style fixes separately requires quite a bit of dicipline and
> means extra work (resolving conflicts). It makes little sense to
> 'just remember' the files that need style fixes, and fix them in
> another CVS tree: then it feels more like
Nicolas Sceaux writes:
> > I like the stylistic patches.
/me too, gives warm fuzzy feelings and saves me a bit of work.
> > Jan always complains of my style, and
> > he's probably right, but if you clean up after me, it frees me to do
> > interesting stuff :-). Still, but I would prefer to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> When a pattern is encountered a few times, it is common pratice to
> write a macro that will expand to that pattern. For instance:
>
> and there are several other occurences of that pattern. There could be
> something that will allow to write, for instance:
>
>
> w
Werner LEMBERG writes:
> Currently, I see lines like
>
> * GNU LilyPond: (./lilypond/lilypond).The GNU music typesetter.
>^^^
> Is this really correct?
Yes. The info docs are now installed in a separate directory:
INFODIR/lilypond (like emacs-21/), toge
Werner LEMBERG writes:
> The current compilation problem triggers a nasty bug in makeinfo 4.6:
> /home/sx0005/lilypond//Documentation/user/out/introduction.texi:95:
> @image file `lily-212977279.txt' (for text) unreadable:
> No such file or directory.
> ...
> Too many errors! Gave u
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 00:43:00 +0100, Han-Wen a dit :
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> The goal of course is to help users (hmm, it cannot be only me, there
>> must be few others!) creating scheme functions. Collateral damage:
>> internal function definitions may also be simpler.
>>
>> Do you thi
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 00:38:31 +0100, Han-Wen a dit :
> I like the stylistic patches. Jan always complains of my style, and
> he's probably right, but if you clean up after me, it frees me to do
> interesting stuff :-). Still, but I would prefer to handle them
> separately, i.e. try not to mix st
32 matches
Mail list logo
