[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Hi,
>
> I've notice that ties aren't working across \relative blocks like:
>
> \score {
> \new Staff \notes {
> \relative c {
> c'1 ~
> }
> \relative c {
> c'4 d e f
> }
> }
> \paper { }
> }
>
> The
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Hi,
>
> I know an identifier can't have numbers, underscores, or dashes but I'd
> really appreciate if at least dashes were allowed. I'd love to be able
> to write identifiers like:
>
> \this-is-my-identifier
>
> Would that be possible?
try #this-is-my-identifier.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> then back to read the notes of the chord. Would it be possible to
> support both versions?
Sure it is. Just type (pre 1.9.4) or <> (1.9.4)
> > My feeling is that << >> stands out better in the text, and that in
> > the < > version the chord-pitches do not appear
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003 20:06:39 +0200
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Chords are more often used than simultaneous music. Hence, using < >
> for chords saves keystrokes. However, the benefit is not large,
> since << and >> are rather easy to type.
Eh... it's not a big deal, but <
Hi,
I've notice that ties aren't working across \relative blocks like:
\score {
\new Staff \notes {
\relative c {
c'1 ~
}
\relative c {
c'4 d e f
}
}
\paper { }
}
The funny thing is, if I remove the first "\relative c" (and jus
Hi,
I know an identifier can't have numbers, underscores, or dashes but I'd
really appreciate if at least dashes were allowed. I'd love to be able
to write identifiers like:
\this-is-my-identifier
Would that be possible?
Pedro
___
Lilypond-devel mai
> What about the readability of << >> vs. < > ?
IMO, for readability is good but for <> it is bad.
If I look syntax
I'll see the notes, and looking at
<> I'll see the angle brackets with my eyes going from
left to right trying to focus.
It is possible to drop << >> complete
