[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> After having mostly completed a rewrite of the ChordName to pitch code, it
> became apparent to me that the opposite problem (converting a chord
> representation to pitches) is much easier. Perhaps a regrouping might be in
> order.
>
> [..]
>
> Implementation of chord re
I said I'd do my best to fix the chords in lilypond a while ago, but
personal commitments (and the daunting prospects of having to learn guile
and LaTex) prevented me from getting around to it. However, I now have some
time on my hands, and a burning desire to produce beuatiful jazz charts on
lily.
I've been quietly mulling over how to undertake a rewrite for the chord name
generation for a while. Along the way I've run into a number of nightmare
chords (C:5+.5-.9+.9-, for example), and a number of chord-writing
conventions that really challenge the current approach being taken for
chords in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> How about an upgrade to autoconf 2.5 ?
>
There are some bugs in autoconf 2.5 that can't be worked around. We're
still waiting for their response to our bugreport.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen
__
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
I think this was already fixed in 1.6.3, can you upgrade to 1.6.6 and
see if that fixes the problem?
(this refers to the botched spacing)
I fixed the problem with rest dots in CVS (1.6 branch).
I just upgraded to the most recent cvs version and
everything works fine n
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> >
> > > The DVI has mismatched fonts, so my guess is that it is not a recent
> > > version of lily. Which version of lily did you use, and can you send
> > > the corresponding .ly file?
> >
> > I used version 1.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>
> > The DVI has mismatched fonts, so my guess is that it is not a recent
> > version of lily. Which version of lily did you use, and can you send
> > the corresponding .ly file?
>
> I used version 1.6.0
I think this was already fixed in 1.6
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
The DVI has mismatched fonts, so my guess is that it is not a recent
version of lily. Which version of lily did you use, and can you send
the corresponding .ly file?
I used version 1.6.0
The source.ly is attached
regards Klaus
\header {
title = "Praise be to God"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> > Although I can imagine that this could happen, your example looks fine
> > to me, so I think I'm missing something. Can you explain more clearly
> > what spacing you think is bad?
>
> I'll just give you both the dvi of the entire piece,
> o
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Although I can imagine that this could happen, your example looks fine
to me, so I think I'm missing something. Can you explain more clearly
what spacing you think is bad?
I'll just give you both the dvi of the entire piece,
one produced with the old code, one with the n
10 matches
Mail list logo
