ailto:license-discuss@lists.opensource.org
Betreff: Re: [License-discuss] For Discussion: Open Logistics License v1.1
Dear McCoy,
Please excuse my late reply and thanks for your comments.
Regarding the termination clause, I'm not sure that I fully understand your
point in the correct way. We t
cess again.
Thanks for the help!
Best regards
Andreas
Von: License-discuss Im Auftrag
von Andreas Nettsträter
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. Oktober 2022 16:16
An: mc...@lexpan.law; license-discuss@lists.opensource.org
Betreff: Re: [License-discuss] For Discussion: Open Logistics License v1.1
Dear McCo
oy Smith
Gesendet: Montag, 19. September 2022 18:11
An: license-discuss@lists.opensource.org
Betreff: Re: [License-discuss] For Discussion: Open Logistics License v1.1
I still find the patent language confusing. To wit:
The grant says that "no patent licenses are granted for use of the Subject
I still find the patent language confusing. To wit:
The grant says that no patent licenses are granted for use of the Subject
Matter of the License or the Contributions which become necessary for its
lawful use due to the fact that third party
modifications are made to the Subject Matter of the L
Dear all,
Do you see any critical points which need to be solved before resubmitting the
Open Logistics License for license review?
Thanks for all your feedback and comments in advance.
Regards
Andreas
Von: License-discuss Im Auftrag
von Andreas Nettsträter
Gesendet: Dienstag, 30. August 2
