On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 12:22 AM Richard Fontana
wrote:
> I suggest we continue to think of the International category as
> encompassing licenses "targeting specific languages and
> jurisdictions", to use Mike's phrasing from 2015, rather than the
> typical approach we see in open source licensing
On 2018-12-07 3:06 a.m., Matija Šuklje wrote:
I suggest we continue to think of the International category as
encompassing licenses "targeting specific languages and
jurisdictions", to use Mike's phrasing from 2015, rather than
the typical approach we see in open source licensing of having
a sing
Dne petek, 07. december 2018 ob 06:22:41 CET je Richard Fontana
napisal(a):
> I suggest we continue to think of the International category as
> encompassing licenses "targeting specific languages and
> jurisdictions", to use Mike's phrasing from 2015, rather than
> the typical approach we see in o
Back in 2015 the OSI adopted an additional "International" license
category, as explained in this license-discuss posting by Mike
Milinkovich:
http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/2015-June/019234.html.
The assumption at the time (at least to my recollection) s
