A 95482
-----Original Message-
From: VM (Vicky) Brasseur
Sent: Wednesday, September 8, 2021 11:45 AM
To: mc...@lexpan.law; license-discuss@lists.opensource.org
Cc: lro...@rosenlaw.com
Subject: Re: [License-discuss] Status of earlier AFL licenses?
That's the process I'm familiar with,
were more easily
searchable
-Original Message-----
From: VM (Vicky) Brasseur
Sent: Wednesday, September 8, 2021 11:45 AM
To: mc...@lexpan.law; license-discuss@lists.opensource.org
Cc: lro...@rosenlaw.com
Subject: Re: [License-discuss] Status of earlier AFL licenses?
That's the proce
versions, although typically that's shown in the superseded
list.
-----Original Message-
From: License-discuss
On Behalf Of VM (Vicky) Brasseur
Sent: Tuesday, September 7, 2021 9:13 PM
To: license-discuss@lists.opensource.org
Subject: [License-discuss] Status of earlier AFL licenses?
Hi
Hi, folks!
The SPDX folks are trying to sort out the status of the versions of the
Academic Free License prior to v3.0.
Basically, the Wayback Machine shows that the earlier versions are
OSI-approved but they're not showing that way on the site anymore.
Searching the list archives didn't tur
Hello!
If you haven't done so yet, you probably want to review the quite
comprehensive FAQ that the FSF has for the GPL family of licenses:
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html
It provides in-depth answers (and reasons for those answers) for a large
number of questions.
--V
Yamada Yo
Mark Thomas wrote on 7/2/21 03:27:
Hi Stuart,
Can I suggest that you give your new license a name to clearly
distinguish it from other licenses, particularly the ALv2?
+1 to this suggestion…
Downstream users of your open source products need to describe the
licenses of their dependencies and
McCoy Smith wrote on 25/8/20 15:41:
Interestingly enough, the original submission of the Vaccine License to the
OSI had what appears to be a phony SPDX designation, "SPDX: Vaccine-1.0 "
included in the submitted license text.
https://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource
Andrew DeMarsh wrote on 25/8/20 13:51:
There are plenty of legal professionals on this list that can most
likely write a far better rule/requirment, I personally would not throw
in the X projects requirement as I think that changes the rules
significantly from what they are today and would requ
