nitial downloading date is not
especially relevant.
Le mer. 21 déc. 2022 à 12:35, David Woolley a
écrit :
> On 21/12/2022 10:50, Patrice-Emmanuel Schmitz via License-discuss wrote:
> > So any idea of banning choice of law clauses will raise serious issues,
> at
> > least in t
I must tell everyone having serious doubts about the utility of omitting
(or banning !!!) choice of law clauses.
Venue (the competent court) is something different and it could be anywhere
indeed, i.e. in the defendant country, but a clear reference to applicable
law looks important when the case r
Yes the idea is interesting.
So you avoid giving a "blank check" to the FSF by giving another to OSI...
I assume that both organisations are safe :-)
For its EUPL compatibility, the European Commission avoided references to
external entities by specifying:
" later versions of the licence as long as
Just a candid question from someone that has not closely followed the case.
The case moved from patent infringement (original claim in 2010) to
copyright infringement: 1) are API copyrightable 2) was their use fair or
not? The second question only was answered by the Supreme Court.
Did someone che
There is, of course, a contradiction with OSD "non-discrimination"
principles here, but, as a - very occasional - License Discuss contributor,
I would like to highlight another point that is present in a lot of
contributions (and could be submitted as a question to nearly all license
steward candid
in a way which prejudices the legitimate interests of the rightholder
or which conflicts with a normal exploitation of the program.
Le dim. 30 juin 2019 à 00:26, Bruce Perens a écrit :
> Is this a doctrine, or explicit law?
>
> On Sat, Jun 29, 2019, 13:59 Patrice-Emmanuel Schmitz via L
As far the European law could be applicable, I just confirm that, for the
purpose of interoperability between several components and when you are the
legitimate owner or the legitimate licensee of these components, there is a
copyright exception regarding their APIs. APIs escape to copyright ,
mean
;utm_campaign=emails-signatures>
>
> Antoine Thomas aka ttoine
>
> Developer Advocate
>
> t: +33 (0)6 63 13 79 06
>
> antoine.tho...@prestashop.com
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 at 13:53, Patrice-Emmanuel Schmitz via License-discuss
> wrote:
>
>>
Dear Antoine,
It seems related to the question: how far is your project (that would be
globally licensed under OSL) a derivative of the GPL-3.0 code, or not?
It is also related to your legal framework, in so far the various codes are
more or less closely linked.
The European legal framework conside
