I ran across something I can't recall seeing before; perhaps someone here has
thought about it previously -- an MIT license with an additional clause
requiring arbitration in a specific venue:
https://github.com/opengovsg/FormSG/blob/develop/LICENSE.md
License proliferation aside; would someth
rotest or two?
Amen.
Michael Downey
United Nations Foundation
___
The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not
necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the
Open Source Initiative will be sen
of this. Meanwhile the projects that are already serving real
implementation struggle to keep and maintain contributors...)
Michael Downey
United Nations Foundation
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
___
Lice
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020, at 11:48, Josh Berkus wrote:
> explain why we have OSD 5 in the first place, because devs under 40 do
> not believe in the OSD. It needs to be explained.
Speaking for myself, some if not many of us folks under 40 both in fact
understand why discrimination is bad, and also
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020, at 13:59, Pamela Chestek wrote:
> No, you shouldn't. License-review is a burdensome process for the OSI
> and the list participants, so it should be limited to real licenses, not
> thought experiments. License-discuss is for thought experiments.
There was also something simila
set
the stage for what's basically a hodgepodge of interpretations globally. For
better or for worse, member states all have their own interpretations of the
rights enumerated in UDHR.
Michael Downey
United Nations Foundation
___
License-disc
Hi Nicholas,
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020, at 14:07, Nicholas Matthew Neft Weinstock wrote:
> As an analogy, think about an artist during the Renaissance.
Thanks for your analogy. Your text as well as Gil's framing question about "how
our creation is used" reminded me of a conversation I had with an art
Hi McCoy,
On February 28, 2020 3:12:39 AM UTC, McCoy Smith wrote:
>You might want to check out Iain Mitchell’s chapter in this book
>
>https://global.oup.com/academic/product/free-and-open-source-software-9780199680498?cc=us&lang=en&;
>
>There’s a second edition currently in the works but it won
talks, or
presentations on why we should discourage bespoke licenses, especially for
governments and similar agencies?
Thanks in advance for any memories or bookmarks folks can dust off --
Michael Downey
United Nations Foundation
___
License-discuss ma
uld be used in the
contexts I describe above.
Appreciate the fascinating discussion.
Michael Downey
DIAL Open Source Center
United Nations Foundation
___
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@lists.opensource.org
http://lists.
Hi there,
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019, at 12:59, Rick Moen wrote:
> I appreciate your speaking, Kevin. I continue to be curious about
> whether users would be expected to enter a contractual relationship with
> Civilized Discourse Construction Kit, Inc. (CDCK), in order to participate.
No, they are not
11 matches
Mail list logo
