Van,
Sorry! I did not mean to show disrespect for your technical competence.
Simply that the cryptographic network in consideration, and its related
policies, are complicated enough that hearing from the designer would be
best.
Thanks
Bruce
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 5:48 PM VanL wrote:
Various individuals at my client, including Arthur, are reviewing a second
draft of the CAL before it is widely shared. When they ate done with their
review, the new draft will be posted here.
As for Arthur, it is his prerogative to join or not join any discussion he
would like. He is definitely a
Are we finished discussing the Cryptographic Autonomy License?
I am disappointed that Arthur Brock did not step up to explain his license
and left all of the representation to Van. Van is not really an expert in
the technical needs that motivated Arthur to ask him to work on that
license, and in m
Copyleft is a royalty-free licensing scheme with the intended effect to
make the licensee's distributees become third-party beneficiaries enjoying
lack of restrictions and access to source code. Pretending that the
doctrine of first sale / exhaustion somehow does not affect copies made
under the co
"So what?"
Here's what it means regarding the jurisdiction, to begin with:
https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/texas/txwdce/1:2014cv00012/668973/28/
"Copyright law imposes no open source obligations, and Ameriprise has not
sued Versata for infringing XimpleWare's copyright by d
I've got a question off-band regarding conditions vs. covenants. Here's
really good explanation apart from conditions concurrent***:
"Conditions in no way create obligations. They simply outline various
limitations. If a certain condition does not occur, this doesn't
necessarily entitle a party to
