Various individuals at my client, including Arthur, are reviewing a second draft of the CAL before it is widely shared. When they ate done with their review, the new draft will be posted here.
As for Arthur, it is his prerogative to join or not join any discussion he would like. He is definitely aware of the discussions here. Also, I would note that while my day job is as a lawyer, I understand the technical details underlying the things I discuss. Thanks, Van __________________________ Van Lindberg van.lindb...@gmail.com m: 214.364.7985 On Tue, Jul 23, 2019, 2:37 PM Bruce Perens via License-discuss < license-discuss@lists.opensource.org> wrote: > Are we finished discussing the Cryptographic Autonomy License? > > I am disappointed that Arthur Brock did not step up to explain his license > and left all of the representation to Van. Van is not really an expert in > the technical needs that motivated Arthur to ask him to work on that > license, and in my private correspondence with Arthur, it seemed he had > something to say. > > Van, this is not a court of law and I don't think there is a downside in > having the client talk with us. Could you invite him to? > > Thanks > > Bruce > _______________________________________________ > License-discuss mailing list > License-discuss@lists.opensource.org > > http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org >
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
