Re: [PATCH] tests: feed -no-undefined when linking libtool libraries

2012-10-05 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Peter, On Oct 3, 2012, at 4:53 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2012-10-03 05:45, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: >> On Oct 3, 2012, at 12:32 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: >>> I just fired up a test suite run... > > Good news! Clean runs on Cygwin, MSYS/MinGW and MSYS/MSVC. Awesome. I'll push the merge now, al

Re: [SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-273-ge24f183

2012-10-05 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2012-10-05 13:15, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was > generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing > the project "GNU Libtool". ARRRGH! I assume this is what you referred to when you talked about some st

Re: [SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-273-ge24f183

2012-10-05 Thread Peter Rosin
> The above looks just like a classic Windows failure. I.e. a line > ending mismatch between the expout file created by the posixy > shell (\n) and the Win32 program (\r\n) and I would guess that > this is a problem that caused failures for Chuck last year as > well. > > I think you need to use LT

Windows Line Endings [WAS Re: [SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-273-ge24f183]

2012-10-05 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Peter, Apologies for having entirely forgotten about the old thread reviewing those patches first time around. And thanks for looking into it. Is there a legal way to get access to Windows and the various flavours of gcc and MSVC that libtool users care about, without spending hundreds of dol

Re: Windows Line Endings [WAS Re: [SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-273-ge24f183]

2012-10-05 Thread Eric Blake
On 10/05/2012 10:03 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Apologies for having entirely forgotten about the old thread reviewing > those patches first time around. > > And thanks for looking into it. Is there a legal way to get access > to Windows and the various flavours of gcc and MSVC th

Re: Windows Line Endings

2012-10-05 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Eric, On 5 Oct 2012, at 23:42, Eric Blake wrote: > On 10/05/2012 10:03 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: >> Is there a legal way to get access >> to Windows and the various flavours of gcc and MSVC that libtool users >> care about, without spending hundreds of dollars on software I would >> never use

Re: Windows Line Endings

2012-10-05 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Sat, 6 Oct 2012, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: I actually run a lot of virtual machines on my Mac, including a couple of versions of Mac OS and Linux, and I certainly wouldn't want to squander perfectly good hardware on an OS that I don't use, and wasn't aware of the 180 days trials, so I'll take a

Re: Windows Line Endings [WAS Re: [SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-273-ge24f183]

2012-10-05 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2012-10-05 18:03, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Apologies for having entirely forgotten about the old thread reviewing > those patches first time around. > > And thanks for looking into it. Is there a legal way to get access > to Windows and the various flavours of gcc and MSVC that

Re: Windows Line Endings

2012-10-05 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2012-10-05 22:01, Peter Rosin wrote: > The remaining fallout is libtool.at, mdemo.at, f77demo.at and fcdemo.at. > I'll see what I can dig out... My guess is that f77demo.at and fcdemo.at fails because of different stdio streams in their mixed mode programs. Tests 159 and 162 (static library) f

Re: Windows Line Endings

2012-10-05 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Bob, On 6 ต.ค. 2012, at 1:28, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > On Sat, 6 Oct 2012, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: >> >> I actually run a lot of virtual machines on my Mac, including a couple >> of versions of Mac OS and Linux, and I certainly wouldn't want to >> squander perfectly good hardware on an OS that

Re: Windows Line Endings [WAS Re: [SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-273-ge24f183]

2012-10-05 Thread Charles Wilson
On 10/5/2012 12:03 PM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > And thanks for looking into it. Is there a legal way to get access > to Windows and the various flavours of gcc and MSVC that libtool users > care about, without spending hundreds of dollars on software I would > never use for anything else? Yes.

Re: Windows Line Endings

2012-10-05 Thread Charles Wilson
On 10/5/2012 2:28 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: I wouldn't recommend that anyone start with XP these days since it is 12 years old, patched beyond all repair, and quickly becoming defunct. Seconded. A virtual machine with "stock" XP will need several full days of running "Windows Update" to bring

Re: Windows Line Endings

2012-10-05 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Peter, Thanks for the other fixes. On 6 Oct 2012, at 06:20, Peter Rosin wrote: > My guess is that f77demo.at and fcdemo.at fails because of > different stdio streams in their mixed mode programs. > > Tests 159 and 162 (static library) fails because different > parts of the output has differe

Re: Windows Line Endings

2012-10-05 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Peter, On 6 Oct 2012, at 06:20, Peter Rosin wrote: > Over to mdemo.at. It fails on MinGW because I do not have > any installed libltdl in MinGW. Temporarily moving the > installed Cygwin libltdl out of the lib search path makes > the test fail on Cygwin as well. So, I believe this is > a gener