Re: libtool does not recognize lib64 -- Update to Olly Betts' patch

2010-10-21 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:25:06PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >> * Toshio Kuratomi wrote on Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:20:09PM CEST: >> > On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 04:04:04PM -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: >> > > Greetings.  I package software

[patch] allow --with-pic to accept package names

2010-10-21 Thread Ollie Wild
This is motivated by GCC. We compile Fortran shared libraries which must execute on systems with no libgfortrans.so. The usual approach, passing --with-pic to configure is undesirable because it reduces the performance of other static libraries. Instead, I have modified --with-pic to accept a li

Re: [patch] allow --with-pic to accept package names

2010-10-21 Thread Peter Rosin
Hi Ollie, Den 2010-10-22 00:29 skrev Ollie Wild: > This is motivated by GCC. We compile Fortran shared libraries which > must execute on systems with no libgfortrans.so. The usual approach, > passing --with-pic to configure is undesirable because it reduces the > performance of other static libr

Re: [patch] allow --with-pic to accept package names

2010-10-21 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2010-10-22 08:21 skrev Peter Rosin: >> + for pkg in "$withval"; do > > No quotes *allowed*. > for pkg in $withval; do > > If you have quotes here, isn't the changed IFS meaningless? > This is the issue that made me send the mail, the others are not really > important. Oh, forgot to ment