On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.bad...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:25:06PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >> * Toshio Kuratomi wrote on Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:20:09PM CEST: >> > On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 04:04:04PM -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: >> > > Greetings. I package software for Fedora and frequently get hit with >> > > /usr/lib64 being added as an rpath in builds. I found what I think is >> > > the >> > > last thread on this subject here: >> > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2010-06/msg00141.html >> > > >> > > In the second message, Olly Betts links to a message from 2007 where he >> > > proposed a patch that would solve this by parsing the output of >> > > /sbin/ldconfig rather than trying to parse /etc/ld.so.conf. The thread >> > > ended with a positive view of the patch and a request to update the patch >> > > for current libtool. This last step doesn't appear to have happened. >> > > >> > > Since I care about this issue, I've gone ahead and ported the patch to >> > > current git master. I'm attaching it here. >> > > >> > Anything I need to do to get this looked at? >> >> I'm looking at it. The patch has issues, the approach itself has issues >> too, and is definitely not ready for the upcoming release. >> >> Details when I have them sorted out. >> > No problem, thsanks for looking. > > /me Awaits list of things to work on :-)
ping? I'm happy to take up where Ollie left off to improve the approach but I need to know what the issues that need to be resolved are :-) There were no mentioned issues (except first run speed) when Olly first proposed his patch: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2010-06/msg00146.html -Toshio
