Hi Peter,
On 20 Oct 2010, at 13:31, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Den 2010-10-05 13:33 skrev Peter Rosin:
>> Den 2010-09-30 09:44 skrev Peter Rosin:
>>> Maybe the shopt isn't needed after all. If the SetErrorMode call checks
>>> if the SEM_FAILCRITICALERRORS is already set, that could be used to
>>> deter
Hi Gary,
Den 2010-10-20 08:55 skrev Gary V. Vaughan:
> On 20 Oct 2010, at 13:31, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> Den 2010-10-05 13:33 skrev Peter Rosin:
>>> Den 2010-09-30 09:44 skrev Peter Rosin:
Maybe the shopt isn't needed after all. If the SetErrorMode call checks
if the SEM_FAILCRITICALERROR
On 10/20/2010 2:31 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Den 2010-10-05 13:33 skrev Peter Rosin:
>> I have implemented exactly that and just posted this to the MinGW patch
>> tracker:
>> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=3081421&group_id=2435&atid=302435
>
> The silence is deafening.
>
Den 2010-10-20 17:55 skrev Charles Wilson:
> On 10/20/2010 2:31 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> Den 2010-10-05 13:33 skrev Peter Rosin:
>>> I have implemented exactly that and just posted this to the MinGW patch
>>> tracker:
>>> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=3081421&group_id=24
Den 2010-10-20 18:53 skrev Peter Rosin:
> Den 2010-10-20 17:55 skrev Charles Wilson:
>> if we (MSYS) want to preserve existing popup-showing behavior at all --
>> which I think we do. MAYBE the following (pseudo-bat-code, where
>> MSYS_NOPOP is set based on --no-popups arg to .bat file):
>>
>>
On 10/20/2010 02:53 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
Den 2010-10-20 17:55 skrev Charles Wilson:
On 10/20/2010 2:31 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
Den 2010-10-05 13:33 skrev Peter Rosin:
I have implemented exactly that and just posted this to the MinGW patch
tracker:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func
