Re: expr complaint on FreeBSD for MinGW cross

* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 01:56:59AM CEST: > Ouch. ETOOLATE. Of course $name is used, in libname_spec for example. > Please ignore this, I'll post an updated patch. OK to apply? Thanks, Ralf 2008-04-19 Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fix nonportable use of

func_arith and func_len

Let's reuse at_func_arith from Autotest, to redo one of the link mode speedups that fell under the cracks a couple of years ago. IIRC somebody else suggested this recently, but I don't remember who. Please speak up so I can put your name in the ChangeLog entry. There are two expr calls that reall

Re: func_arith and func_len

On Sat, 19 Apr 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Let's reuse at_func_arith from Autotest, to redo one of the link mode speedups that fell under the cracks a couple of years ago. IIRC somebody else suggested this recently, but I don't remember who. Please speak up so I can put your name in the Change

Patch for cygwin: autoupdate and objdump

Working with one of the other cygwin maintainers who is repsonsible for about 1500 different cygwin packages, many of which use libtool but have not yet officially updated to libtool-2.2, we've found that the following patch is necessary. (1) ensure that autoupdate does not modify behavior of

Re: Patch for cygwin: autoupdate and objdump

Charles Wilson wrote: Not only that, but this may fix another possible bug on Linux ELF systems, as there is a test on that platform (line 2461 after the patch) which uses OBJDUMP, which I don't see where it would have been defined. Ah...found the OTHER other thread where the OBJDUMP issue wa

Re: expr complaint on FreeBSD for MinGW cross

On Sat, 19 Apr 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 01:56:59AM CEST: Ouch. ETOOLATE. Of course $name is used, in libname_spec for example. Please ignore this, I'll post an updated patch. OK to apply? While I have not tested this patch, it looks ok

Re: func_arith and func_len

[ ] Hello Bob, Roland, * Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 05:13:13PM CEST: > On Sat, 19 Apr 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > >> Let's reuse at_func_arith from Autotest, to redo one of the link mode >> speedups th

Re: expr complaint on FreeBSD for MinGW cross

* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 06:13:58PM CEST: > On Sat, 19 Apr 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >> >> OK to apply? > > While I have not tested this patch, it looks ok to apply to me. Thanks, pushed as well. Cheers, Ralf

Re: [libtool-2.2.2] testsuite on NFS mount on AIX

Hello Michael, * Michael Haubenwallner wrote on Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 04:59:43PM CEST: > > when doing the libtool testsuite in some NFS mounted directory on AIX, > the output is full of lines looking like: > rm: cannot remove directory > `/nfsmount/libtool-2.2.2/tests/testsuite.dir/25/bro

Re: add cegcc support

Hey, I will then apply your patch after we have sorted out the git mess. Here is another patch. It changes cegcc to cegcc* and *-cegcc* to *-*-cegcc* Indeed, the cegcc compiler can have in the future another name with a suffix, according to cegcc developpers. libtool tests have the same

Re: add cegcc support

* Vincent Torri wrote on Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 07:04:26PM CEST: > >> I will then apply your patch after we have sorted out the git mess. > > Here is another patch. It changes cegcc to cegcc* and *-cegcc* to > *-*-cegcc* > > Indeed, the cegcc compiler can have in the future another name with a >

Re: add cegcc support

Here is another patch. It changes cegcc to cegcc* and *-cegcc* to *-*-cegcc* Indeed, the cegcc compiler can have in the future another name with a suffix, according to cegcc developpers. A minor nit: --- libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh 11 Apr 2008 17:21:55 - 1.106 +++ libltdl/config/l

Re: func_arith and func_len

On 4/19/08, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [ ] > > Hello Bob, Roland, > > * Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 05:13:13PM CEST: > > On Sat, 19 Apr 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > >> Let's reus

Re: func_arith and func_len

Hello Roland, * Roland Mainz wrote on Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 11:46:02PM CEST: > On 4/19/08, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [ > > ] > [snip] > > 2008-04-19 Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >

Re: func_arith and func_len

On Sun, 20 Apr 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Sorry, but: first, there is no floating point in either Libtool, nor Posix shell semantics. Second, if you can prove to me (by posting timing comparisons) that conversion from integer to string or vice versa, has *any* performance impact whatsoever on

Re: func_arith and func_len

* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 02:42:00AM CEST: > On Sun, 20 Apr 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >> >> Sorry, but: first, there is no floating point in either Libtool, nor >> Posix shell semantics. Second, if you can prove to me (by posting >> timing comparisons) that conversion from

Re: func_arith and func_len

On 4/20/08, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Roland Mainz wrote on Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 11:46:02PM CEST: > > On 4/19/08, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > [ > ] [snip] > > Erm... thanks! ... :

Re: func_arith and func_len

* Roland Mainz wrote on Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 03:03:24AM CEST: > On 4/20/08, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Second, if you can prove to me (by posting > > timing comparisons) that conversion from integer to string or vice > > versa, > > Here come the requested numbers: > -- snip -