On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 10:39:42AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2013-08-22 17:48, Alan Modra wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 09:34:10PM +0700, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> >>> How can it be correct to say "-m elf32lppclinux" (32-bit) when $host is
> >>> explicitly 64-bit? That seems like utter gar
On 2013-08-22 17:48, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 09:34:10PM +0700, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>>> How can it be correct to say "-m elf32lppclinux" (32-bit) when $host is
>>> explicitly 64-bit? That seems like utter garbage to me. What am I
>>> missing this time?
>
> As far as I underst
Hi Brooks,
On Aug 23, 2013, at 5:52 AM, Brooks Moses wrote:
> Based on Alan's explanation and what I could tell from looking at the code,
> I've tried to expand the comments to explain what's going on, as per the
> attached patch. Does this look like a useful improvement to the situation?
Per
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 11:10:09AM +0700, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation, I finally do get it. Phew :)
Oh good, because I'm not sure I really understood it despite writing
an explanation. :)
> I believe I already fixed it with the most recent amendment committed
> under you
Hi Alan,
Thanks for the fast feedback.
On Aug 22, 2013, at 10:48 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 09:34:10PM +0700, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>>> How can it be correct to say "-m elf32lppclinux" (32-bit) when $host is
>>> explicitly 64-bit? That seems like utter garbage to me. What a
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 09:34:10PM +0700, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> > How can it be correct to say "-m elf32lppclinux" (32-bit) when $host is
> > explicitly 64-bit? That seems like utter garbage to me. What am I
> > missing this time?
As far as I understand, this piece of libtool is supplying ld op
Hi Peter,
On Aug 22, 2013, at 8:58 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2013-08-22 10:20, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>> On Aug 22, 2013, at 2:54 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>> On 2013-08-22 09:40, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> Can we please get this simple patch pushed?
Done.
>>>
>>> To me, it appears
On 2013-08-22 10:20, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On Aug 22, 2013, at 2:54 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>
>> On 2013-08-22 09:40, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
Can we please get this simple patch pushed?
>>>
>>> Done.
>>
>> To me, it appears as if what you actually pushed was not what was post
On 2013-08-22 15:25, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 01:16:04PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> I guess I'm just thoroughly confused, but in my world there ought to
>> be four variations of $host; 64- or 32-bit, and big or little endian.
>>
>> This patch seems to only handle builds going f
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 01:16:04PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> I guess I'm just thoroughly confused, but in my world there ought to
> be four variations of $host; 64- or 32-bit, and big or little endian.
>
> This patch seems to only handle builds going from 64-bit to 32-bit
> ($host powerpc64-* an
On 2013-08-22 10:19, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> On Aug 22, 2013, at 2:59 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> On 2013-06-06 07:18, Alan Modra wrote:
*snip*
>>> diff --git a/m4/libtool.m4 b/m4/libtool.m4
>>> index d7013c5..501246d 100644
>>> --- a/m4/libtool.m4
>>> +++ b/m4/libtool.m4
>>> @@ -1307,7 +1307,7 @
Hi Peter,
On Aug 22, 2013, at 3:19 PM, "Gary V. Vaughan" wrote:
>> All other inner cases match one of the outer or-ed expressions (i.e.
>> from the first hunk) quite closely, but the outer match is still
>> powerpc*-*linux* while the inner match has dropped the trailing
>> -*linux* part. I would
Hi Peter,
On Aug 22, 2013, at 2:54 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2013-08-22 09:40, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>>> Can we please get this simple patch pushed?
>>
>> Done.
>
> To me, it appears as if what you actually pushed was not what was posted?
I am an idiot. Thanks for the heads up, fixed in t
On Aug 22, 2013, at 2:59 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Ok, Gary pushed something while I wrote this, but I'm sending it
> anyway since what he pushed didn't look quite right to me…
Argh. I pasted the patch from my browser to a terminal to save hunting
my archives for the original email, and
Hi!
Ok, Gary pushed something while I wrote this, but I'm sending it
anyway since what he pushed didn't look quite right to me...
On 2013-06-06 07:18, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 11:31:34AM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
>> This adds support for little-endian powerpc linux, and tidies t
On 2013-08-22 09:40, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>> Can we please get this simple patch pushed?
>
> Done.
To me, it appears as if what you actually pushed was not what was posted?
Cheers,
Peter
Hi Brooks, Alan,
On Aug 22, 2013, at 12:59 AM, Brooks Moses wrote:
> Ping?
>
> (And adding libtool@, in hopes of getting a little more attention, as pings
> on libtool-patches@ seem to be going nowhere.)
>
> On 06/05/2013 07:01 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
>> This adds support for little-endian powe
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 08:31:03AM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> Ping?
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2013-06/msg1.html
>
> On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 02:48:22PM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> > * m4/libtool.m4 (ld -m flags): Remove non-canonical ppc host match.
> > Support
> Haven't found enough time to do the review
.. but I should have to try to find at least a second. I see patch is
relevant to libtool, sorry for my previous pointless comment.
> [...] config.sub won't return ppc*-*linux* so there isn't much point in
> matching that. [...]
Haven't found enough time to do the review but issues with
config.{guess,sub} should be discussed on different list:
config-patc...@gnu.org
Pavel
Ping?
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2013-06/msg1.html
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 02:48:22PM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> * m4/libtool.m4 (ld -m flags): Remove non-canonical ppc host match.
> Support little-endian powerpc linux host.
--
Alan Modra
Australia Developm
This adds support for little-endian powerpc linux, and tidies the
existing host match for powerpc. config.sub won't return ppc*-*linux*
so there isn't much point in matching that.
* m4/libtool.m4 (ld -m flags): Remove non-canonical ppc host match.
Support little-endian powerpc lin
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 11:31:34AM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> This adds support for little-endian powerpc linux, and tidies the
> existing host match for powerpc. config.sub won't return ppc*-*linux*
> so there isn't much point in matching that.
> - ppc*-*linux*|powerpc*-*linux*)
> +
23 matches
Mail list logo
