On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 11:10:09AM +0700, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > Thanks for the explanation, I finally do get it. Phew :)
Oh good, because I'm not sure I really understood it despite writing an explanation. :) > I believe I already fixed it with the most recent amendment committed > under your name (exactly by removing the errant * from the case branch > matches). Please pull the most recent revision and let me know if I still > didn't fix everything I broke recently. Thanks! It looks good now. -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM
