> I just committed a slightly modified patch in your name.
Thank you very much Peter.
Christophe
On 09/05/2011 02:10 PM, Christophe Jarry wrote:
Please learn to use git for sending patches; thanks!
The new patch is attached.
Please tell me if there are still issues with it.
Christophe
I just committed a slightly modified patch in your name.
Peter
On 09/04/2011 03:22 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> -# This must be Linux ELF.
> +# This must be GNU/Linux ELF.
The comment does not match the code below it, see the following line.
Not your fault, and generally I don't want to take patches hostage on
unrelated bugs, but*please* make this
# T
Dear developers,
Some days ago, I did post a patch to fix bug #9210
(http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2011-09/msg00013.html). As
far as I can see on http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/libtool.git/log/, the
patch has not been applied yet.
Is there something wrong in the patch? If it
On Mon, 5 Sep 2011, Christophe Jarry wrote:
Please learn to use git for sending patches; thanks!
The new patch is attached.
Please tell me if there are still issues with it.
This patch looks ok to apply to me.
Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.or
> Please learn to use git for sending patches; thanks!
The new patch is attached.
Please tell me if there are still issues with it.
Christophe
>From 965eb1b22d3350ee24765b0c115a91512a382f3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christophe Jarry
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 20:49:19 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Rep
Hello Ralf,
On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 15:22:55 +0200
"Ralf Wildenhues" wrote:
> > --- libtool.orig/libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh 2011-08-31
> > 21:50:53.0 +0200 +++ libtool.new/libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh
> > 2011-09-04 12:27:53.0 +0200
>
> Please learn to use git for sending patches; tha
Hello Christophe,
* Christophe Jarry wrote on Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 12:55:37PM CEST:
> --- libtool.orig/libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh 2011-08-31 21:50:53.0
> +0200
> +++ libtool.new/libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh2011-09-04 12:27:53.0
> +0200
Please learn to use git for sending pat
> Version type = linux has been used in libtool for a long time, changing it is
> pointless, not in any way called for by the GNU coding standards,
I understand that the value "linux" of the variable "version_type" is
acceptable according to the GNU coding standards. I think the documentation
wou
On Sep 4, 2011, at 1:05 AM, Christophe Jarry wrote:
> On Sat, 03 Sep 2011 16:34:51 -0500
> Peter O'Gorman wrote:
>
>> Please do not change the version type for libtool library versioning
>> from linux to gnu-linux. [...] I object to this change.
>
> Could you please explain to me why you obje
On Sat, 03 Sep 2011 16:34:51 -0500
Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> Please do not change the version type for libtool library versioning
> from linux to gnu-linux. [...] I object to this change.
Could you please explain to me why you object to this change?
Thanks,
Christophe
On 09/03/2011 02:10 PM, Christophe Jarry wrote:
Dear developers,
I have reported the following bug on (see
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2011-07/msg2.html and
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2011-08/msg1.html).
On the documentation of libtool, the word "li
Dear developers,
I have reported the following bug on (see
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2011-07/msg2.html and
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2011-08/msg1.html).
On the documentation of libtool, the word "linux" is sometimes used to refer to
the entire free
13 matches
Mail list logo
