Eric Blake byu.net> writes:
> |> * libltdl/m4/ltdl.m4 (_LT_LIBSOURCES): Delete.
> |> (LTDL_INIT): Ignore arguments to AC_LIBSOURCES during _LTDL_SETUP,
> |> on the assumption that libtoolize correctly installed them.
> |
> |
> | Looks good to me. Please apply.
>
> Applied.
Bah. I had tested w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Gary V. Vaughan on 5/16/2008 11:07 AM:
|> Subject: [PATCH] Kill _LT_LIBSOURCES; it wasn't checking anything useful.
|>
|> * libltdl/m4/ltdl.m4 (_LT_LIBSOURCES): Delete.
|> (LTDL_INIT): Ignore arguments to AC_LIBSOURCES during _LTDL_SETUP,
Hi Eric,
On 13 May 2008, at 18:47, Eric Blake wrote:
So how about this patch?
From 5160f84d0c1d00883b0db3336d79863286e8e89a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 16:45:29 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] Kill _LT_LIBSOURCES; it wasn't checking anything
use
Eric Blake byu.net> writes:
>
> Gnulib was able to get away with an autoconf-time check because it
_generates_
> the .m4 file that contains the replacement *_LIBSOURCES definition, and
> substitutes the correct directory name in during that generation. And with
my
> proposed patch to gnuli
Gary V. Vaughan gnu.org> writes:
> >> +
> >> +# Like AC_LIBSOURCES, except the directory where the source file is
> >> +# expected is separated from the user LIBOBJ directory.
> >> +AC_DEFUN([_LT_LIBSOURCES], [
> >> + m4_foreach([_LTNAME], [$1], [
> >> +m4_syscmd([test -r libltdl/]_LTN
Applied to HEAD.
Index: ChangeLog
from Gary V. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unfortunately, the autoconf implementation of AC_LIBOBJ and
friends requires all libobjs to be in the same directory, as
declared by AC_CONFIG_LIBOBJ_DIR. That might prevent using
e
Hallo Ralf (and other potential reviewers!)
On 30 Jan 2008, at 22:00, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
Maybe Mail.app will co-operate if I use a '.txt' extension for the
patch attachments? Let me know if this is better. If not, I'll
post with mailnotify, and put up with the broken message threading.
Hallo Ralf,
[Repost with correct Cc: apologies]
On 30 Jan 2008, at 14:43, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 08:44:51AM CET:
On 29 Jan 2008, at 06:45, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
I haven't reviewed your last two pending patches yet (but I'm not
telling you to w
Hallo Ralf,
On 30 Jan 2008, at 14:43, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 08:44:51AM CET:
On 29 Jan 2008, at 06:45, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
I haven't reviewed your last two pending patches yet (but I'm not
telling you to wait for me).
Every little helps, ev
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 08:44:51AM CET:
> On 29 Jan 2008, at 06:45, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
>> I haven't reviewed your last two pending patches yet (but I'm not
>> telling you to wait for me).
>
> Every little helps, even if you don't have time for a thorough review...
You
On 29 Jan 2008, at 06:45, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hi Gary,
Hallo Ralf!
Thanks for your comments.
I haven't reviewed your last two pending patches yet (but I'm not
telling you to wait for me).
Every little helps, even if you don't have time for a thorough review...
What caught my eyes thou
Hi Gary,
I haven't reviewed your last two pending patches yet (but I'm not
telling you to wait for me). What caught my eyes though at a glance
was this:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 07:38:01PM CET:
> +++ b/libltdl/m4/ltdl-libobj.m4
[...]
> +
> +# Like AC_LIBSOURCES, exce
Okay to commit?
I plan to commit this one in 72 hours (or less with a favourable
review) and roll libtool-2.1b. This fixes the last of Eric's recently
reported bugs, making a patch to build M4 with nonrecursive libltdl
possible :-)
from Gary V. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unfortunate
13 matches
Mail list logo
