* Peter Rosin wrote on Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:23:17AM CEST:
> Den 2010-09-07 22:24 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
> > * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 10:20:06PM CEST:
> >> * Peter Rosin wrote on Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 11:25:00AM CEST:
> > Rationale: you don't, and can't, and won't, be able t
Hi Ralf!
Den 2010-09-07 22:24 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
> * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 10:20:06PM CEST:
>> * Peter Rosin wrote on Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 11:25:00AM CEST:
>>> Subject: [PATCH] Adjust naming of MSVC import libraries.
>>>
>>> * libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 (_LT_SYS_DYNAMIC_LINK
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 10:20:06PM CEST:
> * Peter Rosin wrote on Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 11:25:00AM CEST:
> > Subject: [PATCH] Adjust naming of MSVC import libraries.
> >
> > * libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 (_LT_SYS_DYNAMIC_LINKER) [mingw, cygwin]
> > [pw32, cegcc] : Adjust naming of
Hi Peter,
* Peter Rosin wrote on Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 11:25:00AM CEST:
> (BTW, what's up with the strange date generated by git in the next line?)
>
> From baa6de02d18f99e65777dd8092e6a7fc1d734358 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
That's a git artefact, just like the sha1 isn't a real 'From' string.
> F
Hi Gary,
Den 2010-09-07 11:47 skrev Gary V. Vaughan:
> On 7 Sep 2010, at 16:25, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> (or are you all on the 72 hour clock since the first post?
>> I'm setting a new 72 hour clock now in case you're not)
>
> No need for that I think. As long as the testsuite is still passing on
>
Hi Peter,
On 7 Sep 2010, at 16:25, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Den 2010-09-04 16:21 skrev Charles Wilson:
>> On 9/4/2010 4:52 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>> And the testsuite runs have finished and results are the same. I still
>>> want to push this.
>>
>> I have no objections anymore, but I can't approve i
Den 2010-09-04 16:21 skrev Charles Wilson:
> On 9/4/2010 4:52 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> And the testsuite runs have finished and results are the same. I still
>> want to push this.
>
> I have no objections anymore, but I can't approve it.
Here's a rebased and adjusted version now that 5/7 from th
Hi!
I noticed a silly bug in the texi-hunk of the previous commit.
Pushing the below as obvious.
Cheers,
Peter
>From 4faba0449e5abe8d136bbcd30544888b4b9dcdd3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Rosin
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 11:07:10 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fixup texi typo in previous.
* doc/libt
