Hi Peter, On 7 Sep 2010, at 16:25, Peter Rosin wrote: > Den 2010-09-04 16:21 skrev Charles Wilson: >> On 9/4/2010 4:52 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: >>> And the testsuite runs have finished and results are the same. I still >>> want to push this. >> >> I have no objections anymore, but I can't approve it. > > Here's a rebased and adjusted version now that 5/7 from the other thread > has gone in and finalized the interface. The testsuite is still happy... > > Ok to push?
It seems to me that none of this patch affects non-win32 systems, so I can't test it... otherwise I might have spoken up sooner. > (or are you all on the 72 hour clock since the first post? > I'm setting a new 72 hour clock now in case you're not) No need for that I think. As long as the testsuite is still passing on the systems that use this codepath, the original 72 hour clock is plenty long enough time for any of us to exercise a veto, or ask for more time to review. > (BTW, what's up with the strange date generated by git in the next line?) > -- > 1.7.1 Dunno, but git is up to 1.7.2.2. If you see it again after updating, please forward a report to g...@vger.kernel.org. Cheers, -- Gary V. Vaughan (g...@gnu.org)
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
