Re: 1.5 release

2005-04-23 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Apr 23, 2005, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -New in 1.5.15a: 2005-??-??; CVS version 1.5.15a, Libtool team: > +New in 1.5.16: 2005-04-23; CVS version 1.5.15a, Libtool team: Erhm... If this is going out soon, could we perhaps get the patch I posted for libtool.m4 in, to avoid co

LES JARDINS DU CERCLE : EX. MAISON DE FRANCE

2005-04-23 Thread AD.MAILING
Si ce message n'apparaît pas correctement, cliquez ici.     Pour pouvoir lire cette « Information Promotionnelle » en toute sécurité, veuillez cliquer sur le lien ci-dessous :

Re: Solaris whole_archive update

2005-04-23 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 03:41:25PM CEST: > > Ahh, I actually know how to fix the Fortran failures, I think: > AC_LIBTOOL_POSTDEP_PREDEP is missing from AC_LIBTOOL_LANG_F77_CONFIG. > What I don't know is whether this was done by accident or on purpose to > fix some breakage

FYI: Solaris whole_archive update

2005-04-23 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Ralf, others, * Ralf Menzel wrote on Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 05:02:00PM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > The last two commands should compile and the binaries return 0. > > OK, I get > > [anarion:conv]324> ./main ; echo $? > 0 > [anarion:conv]325> ./main_static ; echo

Re: 1.5 release

2005-04-23 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: That is much better and makes the failure scenario much more clear. I like this one. Good. It's not completely accurate because of the deplib loading, but I guess it's good enough. For branch-2-0/HEAD I will try to put this into the texinfo documentatio

Re: 1.5 release

2005-04-23 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 05:13:45PM CEST: > On Sat, 23 Apr 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > >Suppose, the module libfoo depends on libbar. > >- main calls lt_dlopen("libfoo") > >- uses unrelated library libbaz > >- libbaz dlopens libbar as well > >- main lt_dlclose("libfoo"

Re: 1.5 release

2005-04-23 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 04:36:11PM CEST: On Sat, 23 Apr 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: + +8) Note that using libltdl in conjunction with direct uses of dlopening +mechanisms is not supported. For example, it may work if you use +li

Re: 1.5 release

2005-04-23 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 04:36:11PM CEST: > On Sat, 23 Apr 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > >+ > >+8) Note that using libltdl in conjunction with direct uses of dlopening > >+mechanisms is not supported. For example, it may work if you use > >+libltdl but another library you

Re: Solaris whole_archive update

2005-04-23 Thread Ralf Menzel
Hi, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > For now it would suffice if you tried the following > (additionally to making sure there are no regressions in the test > suite): for each $CC above, go to the build dir, and execute > [snip] > $LIBTOOL --mode=link $CC $CFLAGS $LDFLAGS -static -o m

Re: 1.5 release

2005-04-23 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: + +8) Note that using libltdl in conjunction with direct uses of dlopening +mechanisms is not supported. For example, it may work if you use +libltdl but another library you use uses dlopen() directly, but it is +unsupported. What inspired the above? I

Re: Solaris whole_archive update

2005-04-23 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Ralf, * Ralf Menzel wrote on Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 03:15:43PM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 06:14:17PM CEST: > >> > >> Could you please test this as well on your respective Solaris systems, > >> so we don't get a bogus 1.

Re: Solaris whole_archive update

2005-04-23 Thread Ralf Menzel
Hello, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 06:14:17PM CEST: >> >> Could you please test this as well on your respective Solaris systems, >> so we don't get a bogus 1.5.16 release? Thank you very much. > > Oh Brother. This is the correct

Re: 1.5 release

2005-04-23 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
> > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > Also the library version of libltdl in libltdl/Makefile.am, right? > > > (libltdl hasn't changed yet from the previous release, but I will > > > try to incorporate the memleak patch). Ok, I have decided against putting the memleak patch in, because I saw a sligh

Re: 1.5 release

2005-04-23 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Gary, others, * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 09:40:05AM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > Another couple of questions that turned up for me and are not > > dealt with in HACKING (resp. README-alpha): > > Thanks for catching these! We should capture the concensus in HACKING..

eBay Primary Email Address Change

2005-04-23 Thread eBay Inc\.
Dear ebay customer Need Help? We regret to inform you that The primary email for your ebay account was changed on Apr.22,2005 If you did not authorize this change,please contact us using the link below: click here and re-enter your account informati

FYI: aix Fortran and disable-static

2005-04-23 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Applied to all three branches. (Extracted from Gary's babel packages' changes against 1.5.10). Regards, Ralf 2005-04-23 Gary Kumfert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * m4/libtool.m4 (_LT_LANG_F77_CONFIG) [ aix4, aix5 ]: Adjust logic to match the C case: Only disable static if not on

Re: 1.5 release

2005-04-23 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Another couple of questions that turned up for me and are not > dealt with in HACKING (resp. README-alpha): Thanks for catching these! We should capture the concensus in HACKING... > Do I have to increase the serial on libtool.m4 before releasing? > Or after releasing?