Hello, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 06:14:17PM CEST: >> >> Could you please test this as well on your respective Solaris systems, >> so we don't get a bogus 1.5.16 release? Thank you very much. > > Oh Brother. This is the correct patch for branch-1-5, the other one was > bogus.
OK, I'm not sure what this patch is supposed to patch and how I should test this. What I did is the following: I applied the patch to a recent branch-1-5 check out. After that I executed "../configure ; make ; make check" for the four different compilers that I have available. I could find no differences in output of "make check" between the patched and the unpatched versions. The check results are (all on a Solaris 2.9 system): gcc 3.4.3: ... ====================== All 111 tests passed (1 tests were not run) ====================== cc: Sun WorkShop 6 update 2 C 5.3 Patch 111679-14 2004/02/20 and cc: Sun C 5.5 Patch 112760-16 2005/01/25: ... PASS: tagdemo-conf.test FAIL: tagdemo-make.test SKIP: tagdemo-exec.test PASS: tagdemo-shared.test FAIL: tagdemo-make.test SKIP: tagdemo-exec.test ... ==================================== 2 of 109 tests failed (3 tests were not run) Please report to bug-libtool@gnu.org ==================================== cc: Sun C 5.6 Patch 117551-03 2004/11/23: ... PASS: tagdemo-conf.test FAIL: tagdemo-make.test SKIP: tagdemo-exec.test PASS: tagdemo-shared.test FAIL: tagdemo-make.test SKIP: tagdemo-exec.test FAIL: f77demo-static.test SKIP: f77demo-make.test SKIP: f77demo-exec.test FAIL: f77demo-conf.test SKIP: f77demo-make.test SKIP: f77demo-exec.test FAIL: f77demo-shared.test SKIP: f77demo-make.test SKIP: f77demo-exec.test ==================================== 5 of 103 tests failed (9 tests were not run) Please report to bug-libtool@gnu.org ==================================== I will now do the same thing for a branch-2-0 check out. Bye, Ralf Menzel
