On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 07:54:59PM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> [1] Autoconf-2.60 needs M4-2.0 needs Libtool-2.0 (ISTR that
For what does Autoconf need M4 2.0?
___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 05:40:59PM +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote:
> Hello,
> I noticed that the "break" called in a parameter to
> AC_LINK_IFELSE skips the command
> rm conftest conftest.$ac_objext ...
>
> This means that the files are left uncleaned.
>
> The patch attached to this mail expos
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 08:13:11AM -0600, Ed Hartnett wrote:
> When building a static library I notice that it's size seems to vary a
> lot from platform to platform. On my linux box it's about 1MB, on a Sun
> it's 3MB. (Building with completely different tools, one set GNU, the
> other, Sun.)
>
>
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 08:17:59AM -0600, Ed Hartnett wrote:
> Shared libraries are libraries which can be shared by multiple running
> applications at the same time. This improves performance.
It may improve performance. There are three major issues that determine the
relative performance of sha
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 12:30:48AM +0100, Joseph Wakeling wrote:
> First, I'm not sure how to add cflags and library flags to gcc as called
> by libtool.
Given this from your configure.ac:
> MINGA_CFLAGS="-ansi -pedantic -Wall"
> AC_SUBST([MINGA_CFLAGS])
Add a line like this to Makefile.am:
A
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 01:02:49PM +0100, Joseph Wakeling wrote:
> Noah Misch wrote:
> > AM_CFLAGS = -ansi -pedantic -Wall
> >
> > Note that it's usually unwise to add such flags unconditionally; many
> > compilers
> > do not support them.
>
> T
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 08:27:26AM -0500, Paul Elliott wrote:
> The sponsor of peless to debian complains that peless
> links to too many libraries that it does not strictly
> speaking need:
>
> g++ -g -O2 -o peless -L/usr/lib peless-peless.o peless-gmore.o
> +peless-search.o -pthread -L/opt/gn
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 10:40:57AM -0400, S James S Stapleton wrote:
> libtool-1.9f
This alpha release is dated. However, current CVS is broken on MinGW. I would
check out CVS from a month ago or use the latest 1.5 release.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] /c/Documents and Settings/stapleton.41/My
> Docume
I am working to make the libtool test suite pass on Mac OS X 10.1. Status:
24 of 87 tests failed
(13 tests were not run)
Please report to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If others are working on this, let us collaborate. I suspect most
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 07:35:50AM +0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> Noah Misch wrote:
>
> >I am working to make the libtool test suite pass on Mac OS X 10.1. Status:
> >
> >
> >24 of 87 tests failed
> >(13 tests were not
sh, though. It could take _weeks_. I will post a demonstration
of the improved libtool test suite behavior with a forthcoming patch to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], though.
On a related note, I collected enough information on quote removal behaviors in
various shells to add a section documenting them to the the
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 07:51:01PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 08:29:07PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote:
> > I just tried to build cvs libtool with cvs auto* all from today, and get:
> >
> > make all-recursive
> > Making all in .
> > cd . && /bin/ksh /usr/src/local/libto
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 03:29:10PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> Gerrit wrote:
>
> PING!
>
> > Hello,
>
> > With GNU as PIC is not an noop, when -DPIC is used to invoke gas the
> > generated assembly is broken. I saw this problem with a
> > reautoconfiscated version of GMP. This may be unusu
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 08:49:30PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Many Makefile.ams use logic like this:
>
> if PLATFORM_WIN32
> no_undefined = -no-undefined
> endif
>
> lib_LTLIBRARIES = libfoo
> libfoo_LDFLAGS = ... $(no_undefined)
>
>
> This makes -no-undefined only get used
On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 01:08:26PM +0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> On at least Mac OS X libraries built with -no-undefined are different from
> those built without. Why should we not take advantage of any extra features
> offered by the toolchain/OS for libraries with no undefined symbols.
I ove
The name func_quote_for_eval brings to my mind this invariant:
Given any $foo, $bar and $foo compare identically after these commands:
func_quote_for_eval "$foo"
eval "bar=$func_quote_for_eval_result"
It is not so for $foo containing metacharacters with meaning within double
quotes. Natural
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 01:17:19AM +0100, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> - the relinking dependency debacle:
>
> For libtool to relink libraries when installing them, all
> dependencies must have been installed. However automake cannot
> pre-compute this installation order when it is run, and
>
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 12:28:24PM -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> The problem is that Automake does *not* know the dependency graph of
> each object. Within one Makefile, this is possible (and mostly
> supported) but most projects depend on SUBDIRS to recurse though
> subordinate Makefiles so
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 08:52:00PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 08:31:15PM CET:
> > On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, Noah Misch wrote:
> > >If Automake descends into SUBDIRS to install in the same order it
> > >does to build and
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 10:44:33PM +0100, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> Strictly speaking automake does not know these dependencies. It
> knows some dependencies, but because of the possibility to
> AC_SUBST variables for conditional linking, and doest not know
> exactly all of them (think libfoo_
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 07:47:54PM -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >direct dependency:
> >A program or library has a direct dependency on a library, if it depends
> >on some interface that library provides, see node Interfaces for a more
> >thorough des
This is a great document. A few comments --
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 02:05:50PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> needed-following linker:
> A system with a needed-following linker has a means to record
> dependencies on other libraries within a library (based on the soname of
> the dependency libra
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 07:18:48PM -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> My environment involves running in an x86 host running Linux, and
> cross-compiling everything for a different target. A few extra things
> about this are (a) that we do not use chroot or any similar technology,
> and (b) the entire thi
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 07:18:48PM -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> But I need to be able to copy that entire image to another location, set
> ROOT to that location, and cross-compile code using that image in that
> new location.
> export ROOT=/tmp/ppc-image
> ./configure --prefix=/usr CC=ppc-gc
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 01:31:59PM -0800, Bruce Korb wrote:
> > libopts.so.9 => /local/lib/libopts.so.9 (0x40018000)
`/usr' symlinks to `/' (or `.')?
> ** OOPS ** this is the _installed_ libopts, not the one I just built!!!
> Setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH to include /home/bkorb/ag/ag/autoopts/.
25 matches
Mail list logo
