On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 01:08:26PM +0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > On at least Mac OS X libraries built with -no-undefined are different from > those built without. Why should we not take advantage of any extra features > offered by the toolchain/OS for libraries with no undefined symbols.
I overlooked that. > Also testing for equivalence of libraries on Mac OS X is not going to work > (unless you write a special test program) as libraries often contain a > timestamp in the mach headers. Scratch the idea, then. I do still wonder why -no-undefined libraries differ on GNU/Linux. Thanks for the corrections, Peter. _______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
