On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 03:54:58AM -0500, Ezra Peisach wrote:
>
> I too am concerned with performance with libtool. I tried slipping
> libtool into a complicated package and the build time went from 1'20"
> to 2'00". Not the fastest of machines, but
And as more features pile in, it will get
On Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 11:29:23AM -0500, Ezra Peisach wrote:
>
>
> Ok - I'm game. Do you have any ground rules regarding the syntax of "u"?
Well, the higher level we can make it, the better. On the other hand,
making it relatively similar to bourne shell wouldn't hurt since that
is already a
On Tue, Feb 22, 2000 at 03:15:03PM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Hello!
Hi Pavel.
> It looks like that using "file_magic" as "deplibs_check_method" is broken
> in the current CVS repository.
>
> At least support for LinuxPPC is broken. There may be some reasons not to
> use pass_all on this plat
On Tue, Feb 22, 2000 at 07:32:37PM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Hello, Gary!
Hello =)O|
> > > The simplest way to reproduce on Linux-i386:
> > >
> > > Find "i*86 |" in libtool.m4 and remove it. Then run
> > >
> > > ./bootstrap && ./configure && make
> >
> > Hmmm. It works here.
>
> I forgot
On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 10:15:46PM +0100, Assar Westerlund wrote:
> "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It has been working forever!
> >
> > libtool --mode=link gcc -o foo bar.c -L/usr/local/lib -lbaz
>
> Aha, I did /usr/local/lib/libba
On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 10:24:44PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Mar 6, 2000, Assar Westerlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I wrote:
> >> "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> > It has been working forever!
>
On Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 09:48:19PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Feb 26, 2000, "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > making it relatively similar to bourne shell wouldn't hurt since that
> > is already a known quantity, and will be eas
On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 07:09:28PM +0100, Assar Westerlund wrote:
> Hi. Two questions:
>
> 1. Why are the *.la files installed? The comment says:
>
> # Install the pseudo-library for information purposes.
They are installed so that you can link against them with libtool:
libtool --mo
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 02:42:44AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Mar 12, 2000, Geoff Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > You want to use exactly the same tools to do the relink as the user
> > specified when doing the original link. So you want to use the same
> > options, and the same
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 12:15:59PM +0100, Thomas Tanner wrote:
>
> On 13-Mar-2000 Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> >> This might be worth back-porting to 1.3.*, in case we decide to
> >> release 1.3.5. What do you think?
> > Nah. I think we should make a 1.4 branch and m
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 04:32:19PM +0800, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> What is the easiest way to get the current platforms DLL name ending?
> I want a string containing .so on Linux .sl on HP/UX and .dll on OS/2.
>
> I tried reading ltmain.sh, ltconfig and libtool without discovering
> any me
On Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 05:38:35PM -0500, Jason Day wrote:
> So I tried building a shared version of the static library, and libtool gave
> me a shared library, but with a dependency I didn't want. Is there a way to
> link an object file and a (PIC) static library into a self-contained shared
> l
On Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 09:12:54PM -0500, Jason Day wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2000 at 12:43:24AM +0000, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 05:38:35PM -0500, Jason Day wrote:
> > > So I tried building a shared version of the static library, and libtool gave
> &g
On Fri, Mar 24, 2000 at 03:59:50PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 09:12:54PM -0500, Jason Day wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 24, 2000 at 12:43:24AM +0000, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 05:38:35PM -0500, Jason Day
On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 05:16:52PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Mar 25, 2000, Jason Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This is what I'll do then. Maybe this could be a future enhancement to
> > libtool?
>
> Libtool can't do that in general, since it cannot assume an archive
> contains P
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 09:59:07AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Mar 29, 2000, Paul Sokolovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What I'd like to do now is try to make up-to-seamless
> > support for win32 dlls.
If you only care about win32, life becomes much easier. In fact you
probably should
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 11:29:46PM +0300, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> Hello Gary,
Hi Paul,
> Gary V. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> GVV> Unfortunately the dll architecture is so bust, that it would be unfair
> GVV> to use it as a baseline for all the nicer s
On Wed, Apr 26, 2000 at 06:37:49PM -0400, John Wehle wrote:
> This patch updates the libtool HP-UX 10.20 support to take
> advantage of the fact that the linker on this platform does
> support inter-library dependencies.
>
> ChangeLog:
>
> Wed Apr 26 18:12:59 EDT 2000 John Wehle ([EMAIL PROTEC
Hi Bob.
On Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 03:26:42PM -0400, Bob Bell wrote:
>
> AFAICT, I'm bumping into problems with the versioning technique
> libtool uses. Here's my (variable names expanded) libintl_a_LDFLAGS:
> libintl_la_LDFLAGS = -version-info 0:35:0 -release 0.10 -export-dynamic
You probabl
On Sat, Apr 22, 2000 at 09:53:42AM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> The IRIX C/C++ compiler accepts aguments of the form "-LANG:std".
> Options of this form must be specified in order to compile and link
> C++ code, and possibly strict ANSI code. Unfortunately, libtool
> parses these options as be
On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 09:23:39PM -0700, Ted Irons wrote:
> Thanks in advance for your help.
>
> I am running autoconf-2.13 and automake-1.4
> with the multi-language-branch of libtool on
> an IRIX64-6.5 machine using MIPSpro CC Version 7.2.1.3m.
>
> My configure line was
> CC=CC RANLIB=: ../d
On Sat, May 06, 2000 at 12:35:34AM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Hello!
Hey there.
> The current Libtool from CVS (head version) fails when I run configure:
>
> ltconfig: you must specify a host type if you use `--no-verify'
>
> It turns out that the following code from libtool.m4 is at fault:
On Sat, May 06, 2000 at 12:35:51AM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> The CVS/Head version of libltdl/ltdl.c begins with 'g'
> Please be careful and run "make check" before "cvs commit"
> Time to setup Tinderbox for Auto* tools?
Mae Culpe. I missed that when I cvs diffed before committing Paul's
patch
On Sun, May 07, 2000 at 01:18:45AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On May 6, 2000, "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, May 06, 2000 at 12:35:34AM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> >> It turns out that the following code from libtool.m4 is a
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 12:10:06PM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote:
> >>>>> "Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Gary> Hmm. I'm pretty sure autoconf 2.13 set target to "NONE".
>
> Yes, it did, definitely. But it
On Wed, May 10, 2000 at 10:48:30AM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote:
> >>>>> "Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>>>> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Gary> Hmm. I'm
Hello everyone,
My workload has now eased enough to allow to get back to hacking
libtool, and I plan to release 1.3.5 this weekend. Is there anything
pending that I should incorporate into the tree before I roll it up
and ship it out?
Cheers,
Gary.
--
___ _ ___ __
On Fri, May 26, 2000 at 05:01:35AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On May 26, 2000, "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > My workload has now eased enough to allow to get back to hacking
> > libtool, and I plan to release 1.3.5 this weekend. Is
The Libtool Team is pleased to announce patch release 1.3.5 of
GNU libtool. A complete tarball for libtool-1.3.5 will be
available from ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/libtool and all GNU
mirror sites in the next few days, along with diffs and xdeltas
from release 1.3.4. In the mean time you can fet
Hi Jason, Fred,
Sorry for the delay -- I am working through my email backlog after an
extended period of busyness...
On Fri, Jan 07, 2000 at 02:29:09PM -0800, Jason Merrill wrote:
> A while back, Fred Fish wrote this patch to allow an environment to
> override AR_FLAGS, presumably for use on BeO
On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 11:29:15PM -0500, Mocha wrote:
> # make check | grep FAIL
> FAIL: demo-exec.test
> FAIL: demo-exec.test
> FAIL: demo-exec.test
> FAIL: hardcode.test
> FAIL: build-relink.test
>
> that was on NetBSD-1.4Y/Alpha (ELF) and libtool 1.3.5. how can in find out
> why the test fai
Hi Linus,
Thanks for the report!
On Fri, May 26, 2000 at 01:22:25PM +0200, Linus Nordberg wrote:
> The parsing of /usr/bin/nm output on AIX (at least 4.1.4.0 and
> 4.3.2.0) fails.
>
> config.log:
>
> ltconfig:1871: eval "nm conftest.o | sed -n -e 's/^.*[ ]\([BCDT]\)[][
> ]*\(\)\([_A
Hi Mo!
Thanks for the excellent bug report.
On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 01:37:46AM -0700, Mo DeJong wrote:
> Hello libtoolers.
>
> [[snip]]
>
> The CVS version of autoconf was recently changed to fix some old
> bugs related to cross compiling with the --host argument. It would
> seem that libtool n
On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 10:02:55PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jul 19, 2000, "Frank Ch. Eigler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi -
> > On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 07:10:13PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> > libtool: link: cannot build libtool library `libfoo.la' from non-libt
Hi René (and lurkers),
If you have been wondering why I have been quiet for so long, I have
been diligently beavering away at my soon to be revealed secret
project, which I finished a couple of weeks ago. While that goes
through the mill, I have been putting some spit and polish on what I
hope
On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 02:00:15PM -0700, Tom Matelich wrote:
>
>Hello,
>
>I am going to be implementing a plug-in system for a C++
>application that needs to run on Linux, HP-UX, and Windows. I see
>that libltdl will load shared libraries for each of these platforms,
[[Moved back to libtool list, but left all the context for people who
don't follow libtool-patches]]
Hi Paul,
Sorry this isn't a full reply -- I'll try to get back to you when I
have had time to look over your patch.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 09:41:52PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jul 27,
On Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 06:33:08PM +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> Tim Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I need to understand better the way to combine libraries in
> > subdirectories into one library at the top_srcdir. Does anyone know of
> > an example that does this with static libraries I c
On Fri, Aug 25, 2000 at 12:49:29AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Aug 24, 2000, Michael Matz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> If libtool understood -LANG:std, one less thing for the authors to
> >> deal with.
>
> > Yep, I also like this solution most, even if this means a very special
> > c
On Fri, Aug 25, 2000 at 05:26:39PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Aug 25, 2000, Michael Matz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> >>
> >> A pragmatic approach might be:
> >>
> &g
On Fri, Aug 25, 2000 at 08:52:55PM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Aug 2000, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> >
> > Sounds good to me. In order to not penalise IRIX developers, I guess
> > libtool should continue to discard -LANG:foo and friends, except on
> > IRI
On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 02:03:35PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am having some problems linking together some libtool convenience
> libraries and a shared and an external shared library. As part of the
> solution I need to pass the "-nostartfiles" flag to gcc during linking.
> However the f
On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 12:17:32PM +0200, Franz Sirl wrote:
> This libtool stuff reminds me, what would be the proper way to make the
> choice between -fpic and -fPIC configurable? -fpic produces much faster
> code on PPC, but has some size limits during link time. So I would like to
> default
On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 10:52:58PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> That doesn't work. These flags get eaten as described.
> I love manuals!
> All the best,
> Jan.
Which version of libtool are you using?
--
___ _ ___ __ _ mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/ __|
On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 07:40:09PM +0300, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> Hello Charles,
>
> Charles S. Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> CSW> Well, the problem with libtool is that it's a developer's tool. Take
> CSW> the gettext package, for instance. It uses some version of libtool that
> CSW>
On Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 02:36:03PM -0400, Charles S. Wilson wrote:
> "Gary V. Vaughan" wrote:
> >
> > Charles S. Wilson wrote:
> > >
> > > There is *something* in the windows system that gets notified that
> > > myapp.exe depend
On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 01:34:23AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> "Gary V. Vaughan" wrote:
>
> > > Now, suppose that the png folks release a newer version, say png-2.1.x
> > > that exposes some additional features, but is backwards compatible with
> >
On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 04:39:51PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Sep 3, 2000, "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > * When installing a libtool (.la) library:
> > - libfoo.la goes to $prefix/lib
> > - libfoo.dll goes to $
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 02:00:04PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Hello, Gary!
Hi Pavel.
> The latest commit to the head brach in the libtool repository breaks
> libtool. With autoconf-2.13 and automake-1.4 this looks like this:
>
> [[snip]]
> configure.in: 33: required file `../ltconfig' not fou
|_ __ _ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| (_ / _` | '_|// / |/ /| |/ / _` | || / _` | ' \/ _` | _ \
\___\__,_|_|\_, /|___(_)___/\__,_|\_,_\__, |_||_\__,_|//_/
home page: /___/ /___/ gpg public key:
http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk/key.asc
2000-09-07 Gary V. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* au
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 09:51:50AM -0700, Bruce Korb wrote:
>
> All the "error while copying" messages are innocuous because
> the copy is actually successful. It seems weird that the
> "cp" should return non-zero status to the automake Perl script.
Cygwin does that for me too. Linux behaves p
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 07:53:58PM +0200, Lars J. Aas wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 01:41:58PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> : Index: ChangeLog
> : --- ChangeLog Thu Sep 7 08:22:46 2000
> : +++ ChangeLog Thu Sep 7 13:36:19 2000
> : @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
> : +2000-09-07 Pavel Roskin <[E
On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 04:18:48AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Sep 7, 2000, "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Should I commit the following to libtool as an ugly fix?
>
> > $ echo "This file is intentionally bl
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 09:11:06PM +0300, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> Hello Gary,
Hey Paul!
> Gary V. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sorry, just when I thought I have some free time, that boss contrived
> rush. I answer on important points.
No worries. My ISP h
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 12:39:30PM +0100, Nick Hudson wrote:
> [I hope this is the right place for the page problem...]
>
> I've noticed that the
>
> http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/future.html
>
> page seems to have a cvs conflict in it. Take a look a the left hand bar
> around the "Future
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 01:34:34AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Sep 11, 2000, Michael Matz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > output_obj=`$echo "X$srcfile" | $Xsed -e 's%^.*/%%' -e 's%\.[^.]*$%%'`.${objext}
>
> Yep
Applied.
Thankyou =)O|
Gary.
--
___ _ ___ __
On Sun, Sep 10, 2000 at 11:05:28AM +0100, Nick Hudson wrote:
> "Gary V. Vaughan" wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 12:39:30PM +0100, Nick Hudson wrote:
> > > Is there a release schedule for 1.4 or MLB(1.5?). Just curious.
> >
> > When it's
On Sun, Sep 10, 2000 at 11:05:28AM +0100, Nick Hudson wrote:
> "Gary V. Vaughan" wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 12:39:30PM +0100, Nick Hudson wrote:
> > > [I hope this is the right place for the page problem...]
> > >
> > > I've
I would Cc: the cygwin list, but it always bounces my messages...
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 01:55:16PM +0300, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> Hello Gary,
Hi!
> Unfortunately, there's no online
> archive of libtool-patches (why?), so I can't look there.
Wierd I added it to geocrawler *ages* ago, bt they
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 08:08:31PM +0200, Bernard Dautrevaux wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to install CVS libtool in my environment and, after
> several attempts, I have to request some help.
Oops, my bad. I hadn't tried a VPATH build since I removed ltconfig.
I checked a fix in earlier
On Sat, Sep 16, 2000 at 03:55:21PM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> Using CVS Automake, Autoconf, and multi-lingual libtool I see the
> following message printed from configure:
>
> checking whether a program can dlopen itself... cat: cannot open conftest.cc
> no
>
> Under Solaris 2.6.
>
> I bel
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 03:16:55PM -0500, Robert Boehne wrote:
> How can I run specific tests? i.e. only one of the
> tests that are run with "make check"?
> I have my AIX w/ g++ port down to three failed tests,
> hardcode.test, and two others. I tried to comment
> out the ones that passed in the
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 02:20:17PM -0500, Robert Boehne wrote:
> I have a large library that IRIX CC w/ multi-language libtool
> is not happy creating. It seems that the link line is too
> much for CC to handle. Is the only solution to split this
> library into convience libs, then link those to
On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 06:18:08PM -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
> Somewhat of a followup to the previous note: I also added native AIX shared
> library support to ltdl.c, it's the only choice on AIX 3 and 4.[01]. Also,
> the dlopen code
> on AIX 4.2 isn't all that stable, so it's better to use the nat
Hi Bruce!
I'm Ccing the administrators list at gnu.org, to highlight the fact
that the old archives are not available from either the old or new web
address =(O|
On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 12:41:44PM -0700, Bruce Korb wrote:
>
> FYI: the geocrawler record stops 9/16/00.
Geocrawler seems pretty f
On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 12:38:11PM +0200, Morten Eriksen wrote:
>
> BTW, I noticed something which looks a bit strange to me. Beginning at
> approximately line 2180 of libtool.m4 (from the head CVS branch),
> there are a lot of shell variables which are set up. But some of them
> are just set to
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 05:11:55PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Oct 30, 2000, Robert Boehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I opened them up in a hex editor and the current cvs file
> > has extra nonprinting characters after every newline.
>
> > &qu
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 08:33:46PM -0800, Michel LESPINASSE wrote:
>
> * libtool's insistance on using -fPIC for shared objects is sometimes
> annoying. For the mpeg decoder on x86, -fPIC is about a 10% speed
> hit... we do not expect to have many simultaneous mpeg decoders
> running, so we would
On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 10:47:47AM -0500, Paul Berrevoets wrote:
> Building libtool (cvs) on cygwin generates the following error in
> libltdl:
>
> dlltool: Syntax error in def file .libs/libltdl-0.dll-def:1
>
> The problem lies in the definition of 'archive_expsym_cmds' in
> libtool.m4. The var
On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 06:44:40AM -0500, Paul Berrevoets wrote:
> In light of recent discussion on the autoconf mailing list about the use
> of expr subexpressions and what is returned upon failure, I am
> submitting the attached patch. See:
>
> http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/autoconf/2000-N
On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 08:53:00PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Nov 28, 2000, Kevin Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 28 Nov 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> >> On Nov 28, 2000, Bernard Dautrevaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > in C++
> >> > struct lt_dlhandle
> >> > auto
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 01:01:23AM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Nov 28, 2000, "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > How about we simply change the name of the struct to lt_handlerecord
> > or something?
>
> I prefer `somet
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 12:26:26AM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Dec 3, 2000, "David Reid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > How can I get more information on failed tests?
>
> make VERBOSE=yes check
You can also run the tests individually from the tests subdirectory:
$ cd tests
$ VER
On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 09:49:39PM -0600, Albert Chin-A-Young wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 06:49:18PM +0100, Walter Harms wrote:
> > I have tried to create a working example for shared libs on AIX4.2
> > and succeded. unfortunaly i dont have the time to translate my
> > findings into libtools.
On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 09:02:11AM -0600, Tod Milam wrote:
> Gary -
Hi Todd.
> I have a library which loads modules. Both the library and modules are
> created using libtool. The problem is that when my application links to
> the library as a shared library, it crashes trying to load a module.
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 03:22:38PM +0200, Matthias Koeppe wrote:
> While trying to use the new interlibrary dependency resolution
> (load_deplibs) in the CVS version of libtool, we found out that it is
> never passed the list of library dependencies. The reason is a wrong
> define in ltdl.c which
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 12:14:07PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> > "Brian" == Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Brian> Hello, according to the
> Brian> http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/>, the mailing
> Brian> list archives for this mailing list are kept at
> Brian> http
Hi,
Now that the GNU project is moving towards a sourceforge like solution,
I would really like to have cvs checkout behave sanely. As you are
probably aware (especially if you follow the m4-forum list ;-),
sourceforge requires each project to have its own CVSROOT for administratio
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 11:27:57AM -0800, Bruce Korb wrote:
>
> Hi Gary, et al.,
>
> Libtool is obviously not doing the right thing for linking shared
> libraries on solaris. Any clues? :-)
Oh yuck!
I have Solaris 2.5 boxes at work, so I'll give it a spin on Monday and
see if I can figure out
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 12:51:15PM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I cannot update libtool from CVS anymore. The problem persists when I
> check out libtool from scratch.
>
> $ cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs co libtool
> U libtool/.cvsignore
> U libtool/AUTHORS
> U libtool/Change
On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 04:54:43PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jan 27, 2001, "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> exit0x3fc
> >> ../snprintfv/snprintfv/.libs/li
> >> bsnprintfvc.a(format.o)
&
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 10:38:41AM +, Nick Hudson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Since the cvs server has move I no longer seem to get commit messages.
> Has something gone wrong or am I supposed to do something different.
Something has gone wrong!
The default sourceforge code doesn't support commit l
On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 11:35:09AM -0800, Kaelin Colclasure wrote:
> Greetings,
Hi there!
> I'm a relative newcomer to libtool and have just subscribed to this list,
> so please forgive me if I'm re-raising an old issue here.
>
> I have noticed an issue with including explicit _init and _fini
>
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 03:15:29PM -0700, Kevin Wright wrote:
> Gary,
>
> First, I want to thank you for your excellent book on GNU autotools.
> I'm learning a great deal from it.
Thanks. I pleased that you like it -- but I can't take all the
credit, Ben, Tom and Ian wrote almost half of the p
Hi Tor,
On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> Gary V. Vaughan writes:
> > About four months ago is when it *was* working! Unfortunately it has
> > bitrotted a little since then. I will work on fixing win32 DLL
> > building in libtool as soon as I have my gl
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Guenter Millahn wrote:
> Hello developers,
>
> I found a bug in devel branch libtool-20010219/libltdl/ltdl.c
>
> line 2526 must be changed from:
>
> static unsigned last_caller_id = -1;
>
> to:
>
> static int last_caller_id = -1;
Yow! What was I thinking when I wrote tha
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> Gary V. Vaughan writes:
> > If libtool doesn't already find non-libtool libraries on mingw, then
> > that is a bug. libtool works with non-libtool libraries on the other
> > architectures to which it has been ported. P
Hi people,
I have just uploaded the changes to the libtool web pages that I have been
working on for the last few days...
Bruce, when you have your branch up and running could you add the details to
these pages please?
Robert, can you think of anything that is missing from the improved
http:
__/ gpg public key:
http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk/key.asc
from Gary V. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* libtool.m4 (library_names_spec): Use an appropriate filename
prefix for dlls -- lib for mingw; cyg for cygwin; pw for pw32.
On Thursday 08 March 2001 10:54 pm, Kevin Wright wrote:
> From the README.txt in the bzipped version of Edwards libtool-cygwin:
>
> PPS. Really smart cookies will notice a seemingly nonsensical diff in
> the patch file. That's because someone committed some file(s) into
> cvs with embedded bina
Hi Bruce,
On Friday 09 March 2001 5:15 pm, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Korb writes:
> > Is there supposed to be a way to tell GCC/collect2/ld to
> > let me supply my own _init and _fini routines?
>
> ld -init NAME -fini NAME
>
> > Or, am I required to have a pre-determined external name that
Hi Edward,
Your patch is brilliant. Thankyou. I need to build a cygwin installation
before I can test it, but by inspection it looks fine to me. This stuff is
all I have left on my Libtool TODO list: As soon as we have it committed,
I'd like to make a candidate release for libtool-1.4 so t
On Monday 12 March 2001 7:08 pm, Patrick Welche wrote:
> Using source updated Mar 12 11:42 GMT on NetBSD-1.5S/i386 I have a few
> failed tests. In directory tests running demo-conf.test then demo-make.test
> gives...
>
> creating hell
> /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -o hell.static -
On Tuesday 20 March 2001 4:29 am, Tim Janik wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> > > (another implication just sprang to my mind, GModule doesn't currently
> > > handle static C++ constructors
> >
> > Nor does libltdl, since lt_dlsym()
to handle .exe extensions. I've enclosed *all of
> my changes* with respect to cvs libtool and automake.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "edward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, Marc
messy business of merging MLB... any
volunteers? =)O|
Cheers,
Gary.
On Friday 30 March 2001 1:52 am, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> Hi edward,
>
> I have been snowed this week, but I plan to integrate the libtool part of
> your patch in the next couple of days. I'm Cc:ing th
On Friday 30 March 2001 2:23 am, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Mar 29, 2001, "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Which reminds me... once this patch is in and working, I'd like to
> > release libtool-1.3d (probably over the weekend) and declare a f
I think I can factor out the calls to bash - I'll get back to that shortly.
> patches inclosed for libtool.
Thanks, applied (and ported to MLB).
Cheers,
Gary.
> - Original Message -
> From: "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "edward&qu
On Friday 30 March 2001 4:07 am, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Mar 29, 2001, "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Friday 30 March 2001 2:23 am, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> >> Not really. We really must fix the bug that causes us to remove
> >&g
On Sunday 01 April 2001 11:50 am, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> > > >> Not really. We really must fix the bug that causes us to remove
> > > >> duplicate libraries before releasing 1.4.
> > > >
1 - 100 of 744 matches
Mail list logo
