Build problems with SunWorkshop 4.2

2000-03-22 Thread Christopher Knight
Greetings all, While trying to build a shared library that makes use of the STL with the SunWorkshop C++ compiler 4.2 on Solaris 2.6, I have found the Sun's CC does not work quite right if, when building the shared library, .lo files are specified as the objects to link. The compiler does not r

Re: Build problems with SunWorkshop 4.2

2000-03-23 Thread Christopher Knight
> > > > Also, almost everything works after changing all the .lo's to .o's. > > > > Yup. In the multi-language branch, IIRC, the .lo file is placed in > > the .libs directory, named `.o', and the .lo file is created as a > > wrapper script, just like the .la files. > > Yes indeed. :-) Is th

Re: Build problems with SunWorkshop 4.2

2000-03-23 Thread Christopher Knight
ED]> > > Hi Christopher, > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 10:39:39AM -0600, Christopher Knight wrote: > > Is the multi-language-branch at a state that I could check it out and use it > > to build? > > The short answer is that if you only need to use the core libtool > f

Forcing libtool to statically link one library

2000-03-23 Thread Christopher Knight
Greetings all, I'm now using libtool-ml to build my project and now need to somehow force a single library (tcl, :( I know, I know) statically although the dynamic library exists along side the static one (It would also be next to impossible for me to remove this). With libtool 1.3 I simply dump

Re: Build problems with SunWorkshop 4.2

2000-03-23 Thread Christopher Knight
Ossama, Is the multi-language-branch at a state that I could check it out and use it to build? Chris > On Mar 23, 2000, Christopher Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Is there any hack that anyone can think of to switch libtool's usage > > of .lo's t

Re: Build problems with SunWorkshop 4.2

2000-03-23 Thread Christopher Knight
Hi Stephen, Thanks for the info. I'll be sure to check out 1.5 and send in any patches when I have them. Assistant Vice President means Vice President before your company was eaten up by a merger :-) Take Care Chris > Christopher Knight wrote: > > > > Hi Ossama, > >