Hi Ossama, 

Unfortunately we do need dlopen and dlpreopen support. We have a C++ core that 
dlopens a bunch of C++ .so modules. One main reason we switched from Imake to
Automake is to allow us to use the dlpreopen functionality without rolling
our own :( We are also porting to Linux)

How much work is there to do on dl[pre]open? If it is partially there, then
I would be happy to help complete the support while I merge the new libtool
into our build process.

Chris Knight
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bank of America
Assistant Vice President

> From: Ossama Othman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> Hi Christopher,
> 
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 10:39:39AM -0600, Christopher Knight wrote:
> > Is the multi-language-branch at a state that I could check it out and use it
> > to build?
> 
> The short answer is that if you only need to use the core libtool
> functionality on Linux or Solaris, then it should work for you.  Other
> platforms need work.
> 
> There are still some known issues but for the most part it supports
> libtool's core functionality.  Some of the newer features, such as
> dlopen and dlpreopen support, still need work.  So far, only Linux and
> Solaris have been fairly well tested.  I've also done some testing on
> Compaq Tru 64 with the Compaq C++ compiler (and on Alpha Linux!).
> Other platforms may not be supported yet since I generally don't have
> access to them.
> 
> I personally use it all the time for ACE.  Several other groups are
> also using it.  Hopefully they can chime in here and give their
> opinon.
> 
> HTH,
> -Ossama
> -- 
> Ossama Othman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Distributed Object Computing Laboratory, Univ. of California at Irvine
> 1024D/F7A394A8 - 84ED AA0B 1203 99E4 1068  70E6 5EB7 5E71 F7A3 94A8

Reply via email to