Re: .cvsignore files still relevant?

2010-09-13 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Peter, On 13 Sep 2010, at 12:53, Peter Rosin wrote: > Den 2010-09-13 05:46 skrev Gary V. Vaughan: >> Do we still need to maintain .cvsignore files for a cvs >> mirror of our git repo, or is it safe to remove them now? > > What on earth would .cvsignore be useful for in this day and age? I had

Problem building 32-bit and 64-bit binaries on Mac OS X 10.6.4

2010-09-13 Thread Elvis Dowson
Hi, I'm unable to build libtool as binary that includes both 32-bit and 64-bit intel architecture on Mac OS X 10.6.4 using gcc-4.0.1, and get the following error: gcc-4.0: -E, -S, -save-temps and -M options are not allowed with multiple -arch flags The errors are the same for libtool-2

Re: Problem building 32-bit and 64-bit binaries on Mac OS X 10.6.4

2010-09-13 Thread Elvis Dowson
Elvis Dowson wrote: > > > I'm unable to build libtool as binary that includes both 32-bit and 64-bit > intel architecture on Mac OS X 10.6.4 using gcc-4.0.1, and get the > following error: > > gcc-4.0: -E, -S, -save-temps and -M options are not allowed with multiple > -arch flags > > The so

Re: .cvsignore files still relevant?

2010-09-13 Thread Eric Blake
On 09/13/2010 01:26 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: What on earth would .cvsignore be useful for in this day and age? I had thought we maintained a readonly cvs protocol mirror from our savannah git repo... I believe this is still the case. although if we do, how to use it escapes me! From M4'

Re: Problem building 32-bit and 64-bit binaries on Mac OS X 10.6.4

2010-09-13 Thread Peter Johansson
[adding automake @; replies can drop libtool @] On 9/13/10 6:31 AM, Elvis Dowson wrote: Elvis Dowson wrote: I'm unable to build libtool as binary that includes both 32-bit and 64-bit intel architecture on Mac OS X 10.6.4 using gcc-4.0.1, and get the following error: gcc-4.0: -E, -S, -save-t