Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hi Pierre,
Hi Ralf,
* Pierre Ossman wrote on Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 05:36:05PM CET:
I've been trying to use ltdl preloading without having any .la files,
something that doesn't currently seem to be supported. I'm willing to
implement a fix, provided a way out is prese
[ This is http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gnulib.bugs/5080
Please remove bug-gnulib from followups. Thank you. ]
* Paul Eggert wrote on Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 12:06:59AM CET:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Berry) writes:
>
> > Is it a problem in practice, ie, what are these non-Unix linkers?
Hi Han-Wen,
* Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote on Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 01:08:41PM CET:
>
> - using libtool 1.5.20
> - cross building on darwin 7 (PPC/MacOS 10.3) for a linux/x86/glibc2.2
> target.
> - building GUILE and gettext
>
> The following happens: the packages contain libA and libB, where libB
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
| [ This is http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gnulib.bugs/5080
| Please remove bug-gnulib from followups. Thank you. ]
|
| * Paul Eggert wrote on Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 12:06:59AM CET:
|
|>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Berry) w
"Peter O'Gorman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> getprogname(3), if it exists, can be used as well as other
> alternatives (e.g. argv[0]).
Thanks, I wasn't aware of the BSD getprogname until now.
How about this proposal?
* Change the progname module to use the BSD getprogname naming
convention.
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Paul Eggert wrote:
"Peter O'Gorman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
getprogname(3), if it exists, can be used as well as other
alternatives (e.g. argv[0]).
Thanks, I wasn't aware of the BSD getprogname until now.
How about this proposal?
* Change the progname module to use
