On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 12:40:23AM -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Albert Chin wrote:
>
> >Just build ImageMagick-6.1.9 which uses a single Makefile for
> >subdirectory builds (rather than a Makefile per directory). Some of
> >the tests fail because the wrapper script created
-- Special X.x.X Web Promotion --
Offering now lifetime access to High Quality Membersite Content :
-Hundreds of hours of hardcore videos
-Biggest picture collection on the web
-Highest quality voyeur pictures and videos!
WARNING: All the images and videos on this website are extremely vi
Special one time promotion. No charge membership site for life! Use credit card
for age
verification purposes only! Then you are in.
Their hopes are they get you in then you like it so much you want to upgrade to
buy another product.
It's up to you! Your choice.
http://www.w0wo.com/844268/rp
Good Afternoon!
Recenty intrdocuced legislation requires business and home users to print
personal and business checks with security blank check stock and magnetic ink.
Please find qualified suppliers at Google by clicking on the followingl link.
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&i
For those not following the libtool-patch list, Peter wrote up a nice
patch that seems to be working perfectly. It's been committed on
branch-1-5.
On Feb 22, 2005, at 5:35 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Jeff Squyres wrote:
I have recently discovered that the Portland support that I sent
patches in
Jeff Squyres wrote:
I have recently discovered that the Portland support that I sent
patches in for does not work for shared libraries (a LAM/MPI user told
me this -- not the Portland support group, which I find odd).
HINT: PGI -- I'd really like to hear from you; I heard nothing from
you last
On Feb 24, 2005, at 9:37 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
For those not following the libtool-patch list, Peter wrote up a nice
patch that seems to be working perfectly. It's been committed on
branch-1-5.
Oops! I lied -- it *hasn't* been committed yet; it's awaiting peer
review.
Sorry for the confusio
I see that there was a patch committed on this, but I think it's not
quite right, specifically in the Makefile.am area.
In the top-level Makefile.am, the following statement was added:
cd libltdl && $(MAKE) local-install-files
However, there's no such target in libltdl/Makefile.am (nor
l
I just created a toy project based with templated functions on the one
from that thread and I get similar errors. So no, it's not solved.
Do you know the right pgCC mojo to compile libraries with templates?
On Feb 24, 2005, at 9:45 AM, Markus Christen wrote:
Jeff Squyres wrote:
I have recently d
Hi Jeff
Jeff Squyres wrote:
I just created a toy project based with templated functions on the one
from that thread and I get similar errors. So no, it's not solved.
Do you know the right pgCC mojo to compile libraries with templates?
no, unfortunately not. i have not had enough time to really
俺もサイト見つけたから、この前のお礼に教えます！
また他に面白いところ見つけたらメールします。
http://moroero.net/?ss
伊藤より。
___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
Hi Jeff,
Jeff Squyres wrote:
> I see that there was a patch committed on this, but I think it's not
> quite right, specifically in the Makefile.am area.
>
> In the top-level Makefile.am, the following statement was added:
>
> cd libltdl && $(MAKE) local-install-files
>
> However, there's no
12 matches
Mail list logo
